Showing posts with label PCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PCA. Show all posts

Monday, February 21, 2011

My Little Investigation Into The PCA's RUM

For the past few months, there have been some disgruntled voices concerning the Mississippi Joint Committee on Campus Work (MJCCW). MJCCW is a committee set up by Covenant, Grace, and Mississippi Valley Presbyteries to oversee the RUF works within their bounds. Now, I’m not going to get into the nitty-gritty of what has happened within these presbyteries and concerning MJCCW, but as a member of Mississippi Valley Presbytery (MVP), I am concerned about what is and has gone on in the past months. So, following our February Stated Meeting, I decided to investigate some things (via the RUM offices in Atlanta), and I came to a few conclusions. Please note that these are not necessarily the thoughts or actions of MVP. I am saying these things as an individual.

First, here are some things I found out that I didn’t know before and that you may not have known before:
  1. How are RUF ministries started and funded? Your typical RUF is started when a Presbytery decides they want an RUF at a particular college or university. The Presbytery puts funds aside for that ministry to start. Presumably, churches within that Presbytery give as well. After about 40% of the funds are raised, they are ready to hire an RUF minister. After the man is hired, he reaches out to his network (individuals and churches) seeking help financially for his salary and ministry expenses.
  2. Does an RUF ministry have to have all the funds determined by a set budget to start? No. It is understandable that in the first year or so it will be more difficult to get off the ground, and the RUM offices in Atlanta help in such cases. However, the need should drop as time goes on and as alumni are able to give. That is another source of raising finances: alumni.
  3. If an RUF minister is directly affiliated with RUM in Atlanta and not under the oversight of Presbytery groups like MJCCW, are there administrative costs that he has to pay to RUM Atlanta? Yes. Each RUF minister has to give $800 per month out of their ministry expenses (not salary) to RUM Atlanta. What is the $800/month ($9600/yr) used for? Of the $800, $600 is used for administration costs like audits, keeping books, etc., and the other $200 goes to RUM Atlanta.
I thought this was a steep number for the average RUF ministry, so I asked if men struggle keeping the ministry going financially. Some do, but there are procedures in place to focus more time and effort on fundraising, if there are difficulties. I also asked how many RUF ministries had ceased to exist or closed down due to finances. I was told that four had, though three of those are back up and running again. The other one, Marshall University, is still closed.

Second, I have some questions on the ‘best’ way to do the work of campus ministry (financially and governmentally).
  1. Does it make more sense for the Presbytery or General Assembly to be overseeing campus ministries? I guess I should clarify that each RUF minister is still under the oversight of a Presbytery, but I guess this is a question, “Does RUM Atlanta have a hand in everything or anything?” If the Presbytery has oversight, then why do funds go to Atlanta? Why isn’t the Presbytery handling all the administration costs? Isn’t it their ministry, or is it RUM Atlanta’s?
  2. What is the best way to fund RUF ministries?  Let’s first ask whether it is more appealing for a potential giver to give to RUM Atlanta, of which their gift goes to some far off college/university on the other side of the nation that they have never been to nor long to go, or for a potential giver to give to a local group (known as the Presbytery) who will give to colleges and universities you are familiar with? I’m from Illinois, so I will use my state as an example. Is it going to be more appealing to me to financially give to help start up an RUF ministry at the University of Illinois or to give to RUM Atlanta where it could go to, say, the University of Arizona? I love my people, don’t I? I love the Fighting Illini. Of course, I want to give locally. Of course, it is going to be easier to raise funds locally then nationally. So, my conclusion is that a Presbytery or Presbyteries joining together should decide how to start and fund RUF ministries within its or their bounds. Of course, in the PCA, most Presbyteries decide to go with RUM Atlanta. Yet, those with Presbyteries leading the way, like MJCCW, are able to start more RUF ministries because more funds are raised, and there are less expenses. Within three presbyteries, there are 13 RUF ministries including small colleges/universities like Delta State University, Rhodes College, Belhaven College, Mississippi College (a Baptist school), the University of Tennessee (Martin), and even community colleges: Holmes Community College and Hinds Community College. Can RUM Atlanta go after the small schools? I guess that is the Presbytery’s decision.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

2011 39th PCA General Assembly: Overtures 3-5

You can find Overtures 1 and 2 discussed hereOverture 5 is a request to divide the Korean Eastern Presbytery into two presbyteries (Korean Eastern and Korean Northeastern).  Overture 4 from Nashville Presbytery seems pretty understandable.  It asks to delete “c. his views in theology, and d. church government.” from BCO 19-11 as it regards the transfer of interns from one presbytery to another.  The obvious reason for asking for this deletion is the fact that when one becomes an intern in the first place they are not asked their views in theology nor in church government.  Overture 3 then is an alternative funding plan for the Administrative Committee.  You can read about this overture here.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

2011 39th PCA General Assembly: Overtures 1 and 2

The gate has now opened and we are driving towards the 2011 PCA GA.  There are already now two overtures submitted for this year.  Overture 1 is for dividing up Central Carolina Presbytery into three different presbyteries, it goes before MNA so I will make no comment here.  Overture 2 is from South Florida Presbytery and deals with term limits of the Stated Clerk of GA and the Coordinators of the four major committees.

Overture 2 states,


Overture to Amend RAO 4-9To set term limits for Coordinators of Program Committees and Stated Clerk

Whereas, the PCA has enjoyed God’s favor and grace for nearly forty (40) years, and

Whereas, the PCA has been blessed with very Godly, capable and competent men to serve in various leadership positions in our four (4) Program Committees and office of the Stated Clerk, and

Whereas, there has been a stated desire by two General Assemblies in the 2006 and 2010 Strategic Plans to see “Increased Involvement” and new leadership in the PCA, and

Whereas, the members of the Church of Jesus Christ possess, by God’s grace, certain and specific, yet varied gifts and talents which are to be used for God’s glory and are beneficial and edifying to the greater Body of Christ, and

Whereas, Scripture instructs the Church of Jesus Christ to enjoy and make the best use of the varied gifts and talents within the Church (1 Cor. 3:21–23; 10:31; 12:7, 21; 14:12, 26; Eph. 4:11–16; Col. 2:19), and

Whereas, there comes a time in the life of all organizations that a change in leadership is both needed and beneficial, and

Whereas, a regular change in leadership can be the means to identifying and raising up men who have been blessed of God to serve his Church, and

Whereas, the present reading of RAO 4-9 requires the annual nomination and election of the Program Committee Coordinators and Stated Clerk; and

Whereas, this annual nomination and election has become pro forma in that the General Assembly has always accepted the nomination and election of the Coordinators and the Stated Clerk; and

Whereas
, men called to these positions should have a measure of certainty with regard to their status; and

Whereas
, it would be advantageous to the Church to have the assurance that qualified men serve the Church for a specified term of service.

Therefore, the South Florida Presbytery overtures the 39th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America to amend the Rules of Assembly Operation (RAO) 4-9 to set term limits for Coordinators of our Program Committees and the Stated Clerk.

And further, if RAO 4-9 is adopted as amended, that the implementation of this provision would not affect those presently serving as Coordinators and Stated Clerk (the so called “grandfather clause”), but take effect upon the nomination and election of men not presently serving in these positions.

Amend RAO 4-9 with the following deletions (strikethroughs) and additions (underlined)
The four program Committees shall nominate for their respective Committees annually a coordinator for election by the General Assembly for a term not to exceed five (5) years, and may nominate him for election by the General Assembly to a second term not to exceed five (5) years, after which he is not eligible to be nominated or elected as coordinator. The Administrative Committee shall nominate annually a Stated Clerk for election by the General Assembly for a term not to exceed five (5) years, and may nominate him for election by the General Assembly to a second term not to exceed five (5) years, after which he is not eligible to be nominated or elected as Stated Clerk. If the nominee has not been examined by the Theological Examining Committee, such an examination must take place prior to the election when it is a first time employment. A new coordinator shall assume office at the end of the Assembly meeting, or at such time thereafter as designated by the General Assembly.
If amended RAO 4-9 would read:
The four program Committees shall nominate for their respective Committees a coordinator for election by the General Assembly for a term not to exceed five (5) years, and may nominate him for election by the General Assembly to a second term not to exceed five (5) years, after which he is not eligible to be nominated or elected as coordinator. The Administrative Committee shall nominate a Stated Clerk for election by the General Assembly for a term not to exceed five (5) years, and may nominate him for election by the General Assembly to a second term not to exceed five (5) years, after which he is not eligible to be nominated or elected as Stated Clerk. If the nominee has not been examined by the Theological Examining Committee, such an examination must take place prior to the election when it is a first time employment. A new coordinator shall assume office at the end of the Assembly meeting, or at such time thereafter as designated by the General Assembly.

Adopted by South Florida Presbytery at its stated meeting, January 18, 2011
Attested by TE Michael C. Woodham, stated clerk

Friday, January 14, 2011

Meyers Missouri Presbytery Report (Federal Vision)

Here is Missouri Presbytery's Report on their findings into TE Jeff Meyers on whether or not he is teaching federal vision theology. 

Missouri Presbytery’s final report from the committee investigating TE Jeffrey Meyers is available here. I believe that this document will prove to be one of the more important Federal Vision documents to be released in a while. It is a rather complete statement of the issues on baptism, covenant, and justification by a prominent Federal Visionist to a friendly PCA Court.

I plan to post each section in separate posts here on Johannes Weslianus for comment and discussion. The links to the sections available in separate blog posts are as follows:
  1. Introduction
  2. Views on Covenant Theology
  3. Views on Theology of the Imputation of Christ’s Merit
  4. View on Theology of Baptism
  5. Views on Theology of Perseverance
  6. Views on Theology of Justification
  7. Report of the Subcommittee Investigating Process and Injurious Reports
  8. TE Meyers’ Letter of Apology
  9. Conclusion
  10. Meyers’ Q & A — I. Covenant
  11. Meyers’ Q & A — II. The Imputation of Christ’s Merit
  12. Meyers’ Q & A — III. Baptism
  13. Meyers’ Q & A — IV. Perseverance
  14. Meyers’ Q & A — V. Justification
    Here is a timeline of the relevant events in this controversy. Please check back for further updates.

    Monday, January 10, 2011

    Missouri Presbytery Exonerates TE Jeffrey Meyers - Federal Vision

    Here are two links to Wes White's blog where he describes Missouri Presbytery's TE Jeffrey Meyers having been exonerated on charges of holding to false teaching called the Federal Vision.

    Monday, September 13, 2010

    The Forming of the PCA: Part 13



    There are many questions circulating out there by some elders of the PCA concerning the future of our denomination. Since this is a Pastoral blog, I believe it a good thing to look back at some of the writings of the fathers of our denomination as they were nearing the end of the PCUS and considering themselves what was to become of their own denomination, which in the end led to the formation of the PCA.  I believe we can learn from them, and so the following is Part 13 of this little series looking back to 'the fathers of the PCA.'  Please take time to read the entirety though it is long for a blog.  Trust me this is crucial.  

    Forward to Dr. John E. Richards' book 
    "The Historical Birth of the Presbyterian Church in America"
    Entitled "The PCA: Another Tapestry"

    In her recent book, The Tapestry, Edith Schaeffer speaks of history as a tapestry being woven by God. The threads in the tapestry are individual people and events used by God to work out the design of history. 

    Mrs. Schaeffer points out that, as our lives are interwoven with the lives of others, we affect one another's ideas, understanding and attitudes and at the same time we are affecting history.

    We do matter; our decisions and choices matter in history. As Mrs. Schaeffer says, "History is different because you have lived, because I have lived." Every thread is important in the design, there is no insignificant person or event in God's plan.

    In one of his sermons on providence, C. H. Spurgeon said, "God guides the speck of dust blowing in the wind just as surely as He guides the meteor through space. He is in the glimmer of a firefly just as much as He is in the flash of a falling star."

    I have a friend who does beautifully detailed a petitpoint tapestries. She purchases a canvas on which the design is stamped and being an artist she selects her threads carefully, sometimes using six, eight or ten shades of the same color to get the desired effect. When she has completed a tapestry and hung it in her home, everyone who sees it marvels at her skill and artistic ability.

    Keep this in mind as we think of history. Before God created time, He had a design for all of time. We read, "In the beginning God...." In the beginning of what? In the beginning of measurable time. Time, as we know it, had a beginning and it will have an end.

    When time is no more, when God's tapestry is complete, we will marvel throughout all eternity at the details of light and color, of life and beauty that He has brought about in all of history. 

    Now we can only see small portions of history and the details are not always clear, sometimes it looks to us as though the threads are hopelessly tangled, but in eternity we will see the perfect harmony of the whole.

    In this article, I want to take a glimpse at one small portion of history. I want to focus on the beginnings of the Presbyterian Church in America. It is wonderful to see how God has interwoven many lives and events in bringing this church into being. Let's look at some of the individual threads.

    In the 1940's, Dr. L. Nelson Bell and a board of strong men began to publish the Southern Presbyterian Journal (now the Presbyterian Journal). These men were deeply concerned that there was little opportunity for the conservative voice to be heard within the Presbyterian Church US. This publication faithfully and Biblically addressed issues within the church for 30 years before the PCA was born.

    In 1958, the Rev. William E. Hill Jr. left his pastorate in Hopewell, Va., to become a full-time evangelist. Soon other men joined him and formed the Presbyterian Evangelistic Fellowship for the purpose of holding evangelistic meetings in any church that requested them.

    In 1964, Kenneth S. Keyes was asked to head a new organization known as Concerned Presbyterians. Through writing and speaking, this group of men encouraged laymen throughout the church to become interested and informed about issues in the denomination.

    Over the years, conservative ministers grew increasingly concerned about the direction the PCUS was taking. Many of these men began to meet together to pray for revival in the denomination. These prayer groups grew into an organization called Presbyterian Churchmen United.

    The Rev. John E. Richards and the Rev. Donald B. Patterson led this group to publish a Declaration of Commitment in 1969. This statement of commitment to the Word of God and to the Reformed Faith ended by saying: "That, should the basic theology or polity of the Church be altered or diluted, we shall be prepared to take actions as may be necessary to fulfill the obligations imposed by our ordination vows, to maintain our Presbyterian faith."

    The Declaration, signed by more than 500 ministers, was published in over 30 major newspapers.

    These four groups affected the ideas and attitudes of many people in the church and so affected the history of the church. The prayers and efforts of all four of these groups were directed at bringing revival of spiritual life and Biblical commitment to the PCUS. They worked and prayed hard for years but their efforts had little effect on the leadership or direction of the denomination, until 1971 when the General Assembly met in Massanetta Springs, Va.

    At that Assembly, the conservative groups working together put in nomination the names of leading Bible-believing people for every General Assembly committee; they failed to get even one elected. Because of this and other events that took place at the Assembly, many men speak of it as the time when their thoughts began to turn to a new church.

    In the summer of 1971, representatives of these four groups (The Presbyterian Journal Board, Concerned Presbyterians, Presbyterian Churchmen United, and Presbyterian Evangelistic Fellowship) met and formed a "Steering Committee for a Continuing Presbyterian Church." This was announced at the Journal Day meeting of 1971. At this point several men who had been active in these groups dropped out of the movement.

    During the next year, Paul Settle, John Richards, Kenneth Keyes, Jack Williamson and several other men traveled and spoke in many churches where they were invited to present the issues before the church or to debate more moderate or liberal spokesmen.

    At this time the PCUS and the UPC-USA had joint committees working on a plan of union. There was talk of writing into the plan an "escape clause" that would allow any church that chose not to go into the union to withdraw and keep its property. The committees had promised to bring such a plan to the General Assembly for a vote in 1973. 

    Jack Williamson, a member of the PCUS committee assigned to draft the plan of union, was also a member of the Steering Committee for a Continuing Church. In February, 1973, Mr. Williamson reported to the Steering Committee that the "escape clause" had been scrapped. The Steering Committee met with the four executive committees to discuss taking immediate steps to form a new church.

    Dr. Francis A. Schaeffer was another thread woven into this part of the tapestry. He was speaking to the National Presbyterian and Reformed Fellowship in Atlanta near the place where the Steering Committee was meeting at the time. Many members of the committee heard him as he urged that when disagreement is necessary it must be done in a spirit of love and meekness. Some of these men have said that Dr. Schaeffer's talk made them consider even more carefully and prayerfully the decision which soon would be made.

    The vote to begin a new church was preceded by a time of prayer with many of these men on their knees and some of them weeping openly. It was not a decision they took lightly. Jack Williamson recently spoke to me of his thankfulness that he has never heard the men involved in this movement express any bitterness or resentment toward those who disagreed with them.

    In February, 1973, the Steering Committee called for a Convocation of Sessions to be held in May, 1973, at the Westminster Church in Atlanta. Letters were sent to all the churches that had expressed interest in the movement, inviting them to send representatives of their sessions to the meeting.

    At the Convocation, and Organizing Committee of 40 men was chosen to draft plans for the structure of the new denomination, and an Advisory Convention was called to meet in August, 1973, in Asheville, N.C.

    At the Advisory Convention, held at Asheville's Grove Park Inn, the organizational plans were discussed and returned to the organizing committee for further refinement; and the first General Assembly was called to meet in December, 1973, in Birmingham, Ala., at the Briarwood Presbyterian Church. The date selected, December 4, coincided with the original date of formation of the PCUS in Augusta, Ga., in 1861.

    That General Assembly in Birmingham adopted the Westminster Standards as the doctrinal statement of the church and a Book of Church Order as the standard of government. The First General Assembly also chose the name, National Presbyterian Church, and established permanent committees for Administration, Christian Education and Publications, Mission to the World and Mission to the United States.

    An "Address to All Churches" of Jesus Christ through the world was adopted and signed by 338 commissioners. Mr. Jack Williamson was the very able moderator of this Assembly.

    It was the Second General Assembly in Macon, Ga., that the name of the denomination changed to Presbyterian Church in America, because the National Presbyterian Church of Washington, D.C., had protested the use of that name. Dr. Francis Schaeffer spoke to this Assembly, and again he urged that there be maintained a strong testimony of love toward those from whom these church had separated.

    God's tapestry of history is not woven with inanimate threads but with living, thinking individuals. There were times in the history of this movement when men went to a Steering Committee or General Assembly meeting wondering how strong-minded men who held strong convictions on different sides of an issue could come to agreement. Many times in the midst of hot debate someone would say, "Brothers, let's stop and pray about this." Prayer has kept us together.

    During the past 10 years many outside have watched expectantly for this group to become hopelessly divided. Providentially, there never has been one dominant personality leading this movement, but a group of humble men who have sincerely sought to honor the Lord in their decisions. The Lord, in turn, has honored this and His Spirit has repeatedly overruled to bring unity and harmony out of disagreement. Many pray that the Presbyterian Church in America will always be led by humble men who seek to honor the Lord and are controlled by His Holy Spirit.

    I recently asked Jack Williamson what he considered the greatest need of the PCA at this time. He replied: "A consciousness that God has called us into this denomination to work together in trust and confidence to fulfill His will, rather than to build isolated individual kingdoms which will certainly dissipate in their influence when the dynamic individual which leads them is called to glory. We need, in my judgment, a sense of togetherness, of unity, about what God is doing through us as a group."

    Mr. Williamson explained that because many churches could not tolerate the organizational structure of the PCUS, they early began to operate to all practical purposes as independent churches. Therefore it now is difficult for them to grasp that the true concept of Presbyterianism is working together through Christ in a unified effort to make a greater witness. Mr. Williamson concluded, "It's that growing consciousness that we work together in trust and confidence that we need more than anything else."

    Today the PCA is not just a group of churches separated from the PCUS. From the North, the Midwest, the West -- into Alaska and out to Hawaii -- churches have come, or have been organized, to join in a varicolored fabric that includes black, white, hispanic, Korean and Chinese churches. They are large, small, suburban, inner city, rural and collegiate.

    "To whom much is given of him shall much be required." We have been given much in the PCA; much in the way of instruction, much in the way of opportunity, and much in the way of heritage. The godly men who worked to begin this denomination, did so at great cost.

    Some of them were officially charged with heresy by PCUS courts and some were even stripped of their ordination. Some have had doors of ministry closed against them. Laymen, as well as ministers, gave many hours to this work, hours that had to be taken away from business or family. Many of these men were rejected by close friends or family members because of their stand.

    Some congregations were turned out of sanctuaries where they had worshipped for generations.

    Those who have been involved in this denomination from the beginning will never forget what it cost, but they don't want their children to forget that they were willing to pay any cost to insure that their children could worship in a church that would be "true to the Bible, to the Reformed Faith, and obedient to the Great Commission."

    History is different because of the Presbyterian Church in America! Our choices do matter in the design of history. The early history of the PCA was affected not only by those who were a part of it, but also by those who chose not to be a part of it. 

    It was also affected by the prayers of many people. For example, during the First General Assembly, there were people in local churches who prayed every hour the Assembly was in session. Spurgeon called prayer a very effective wheel in the machinery of Providence. He said, "It is such an essential part of the design that we find that whenever God delivers His people, His people have been praying for deliverance."

    You can make a choice that will affect history. You can determine now that you will pray faithfully for the leaders of the PCA. This is another momentus year in our church. The 10th General Assembly will meet in Grand Rapids, Mich. in June. Will you pray that the Holy Spirit will rule in every debate and every decision of that meeting? Will you pray that these men will work together in trust and unity and thus bear a greater witness to Christ?

    Will you pray that the Assembly will be characterized by a spirit of love as well as an unfaltering faithfulness to the Word of God?

    Thursday, September 9, 2010

    The Forming of the PCA: Part 12

    Read Part 1.
    Read Part 2.
    Read Part 3.
    Read Part 4.
    Read Part 5.
    Read Part 6.
    Read Part 7.
    Read Part 8.
    Read Part 9.
    Read Part 10.
    Read Part 11.

    There are many questions circulating out there by some elders of the PCA concerning the future of our denomination. Since this is a Pastoral blog, I believe it a good thing to look back at some of the writings of the fathers of our denomination as they were nearing the end of the PCUS and considering themselves what was to become of their own denomination, which in the end led to the formation of the PCA.  I believe we can learn from them, and so the following is Part 12 of this little series looking back to 'the fathers of the PCA.'  Please take time to read the entirety though it is long for a blog.  Trust me this is crucial. 

    "A Message To All Churches of Jesus Christ"
    Adopted December 1973 at the First General Assembly
    And Published In Most Major Newspapers in the South


    Nationa1
    Presbyterian
    Church
    OFFICE OF THE STATED CLERK
    P.O. Box 256 Clinton, Mississippi 39056
    W. JACK WILLIAMSON
    Moderator

    MORTON H. SMITH
    Stated Clerk
    A MESSAGE TO ALL CHURCHES OF JESUS CHRIST THROUGHOUT THE WORLD 
    FROM THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    Greeting: Grace, Mercy and Peace be multiplied upon you!

    As the National Presbyterian Church takes her place among the family of Churches of the Lord Jesus Christ, we take this opportunity to address all Churches by way of a testimony.

    We gather as a true branch of the Church of our Lord Jesus Christ. We affirm our allegiance to Him as the sole Head of the Church and the sole Law-giver in Zion. We remember that “the gates of hell shall not prevail” against His Church.

    The constituency of this new denomination for the most part have separated themselves from the Presbyterian Church in the United States. The decision to separate has come only after long years of struggle and heartache on the part of many of us to return the Church to purity of faith and practice. Principle and conviction entered into that decision, reached only after much soul searching and earnest prayer. We have reluctantly accepted the necessity of separation, deeming loyalty to Christ to take precedence over relationship to any earthly institution, even to a visible branch of the Church of Christ.

    In much prayer and with great sorrow and mourning we have concluded that to practice the principle of purity in the Church visible, we must pay the price of separation. We desire to elaborate upon those principles and convictions that have brought us to that decision.

    We are convinced that our former denomination as a whole, and in its leadership, no longer holds those views regarding the nature and mission of the Church, which we accept as both true and essential. When we judged that there was no human remedy for this situation, and in the absence of evidence that God would intervene, we were compelled to raise a new banner bearing the historic, Scriptural faith of our forefathers.

    First, we declare the basis of the authority for the Church. According to the Christian faith, the Bible is the Word of God written and carries the authority of its divine Author. We believe the Bible itself asserts that it has been given by inspiration, or, more literally, has been “God-breathed” (II Timothy 3:16). “No prophecy ever came by the will of man; but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit” (II Peter 1:21). We declare, therefore, that the Bible is the very Word of God, so inspired in the whole and in all its parts, as in the original autographs, to be the inerrant Word of God. It is, therefore, the only infallible and all-sufficient rule of faith and practice.

    This was the position of the founding fathers of the Presbyterian Church in the United States. We affirm with them in their “Address to All Churches” the application of this principle to the Church and her mission:

    Let it be distinctly borne in mind that the only rule of judgment is the written Word of God. The Church knows nothing of the intuitions of reason or the deductions of philosophy, except those reproduced in the Sacred Canon. She has a positive constitution in the Holy Scriptures, and has no right to utter a single syllable upon any subject except as the Lord puts words in her mouth. She is founded, in other words, upon express revelation. Her creed is an authoritative testimony of God, and not speculation, and what she proclaims she must proclaim with the infallible certitude of faith, and not with the hesitating assent of an opinion.

    We have called ourselves “Continuing” Presbyterians because we seek to continue the faith of the founding fathers of that Church. Deviations in doctrine and practice from historic Presbyterian positions as evident in the Presbyterian Church in the United States, result from accepting other sources of authority, and from making them coordinate or superior to the divine Word. A diluted theology, a gospel tending towards humanism, an unbiblical view of marriage and divorce, the ordination of women, financing of abortion on socio-economic grounds, and numerous other non-Biblical positions are all traceable to a different view of Scripture from that we hold and that which was held by the Southern Presbyterian forefathers.

    Change in the Presbyterian Church in the United States came as a gradual thing, and its ascendancy in the denomination, over a long period of time. We confess that it should not have been permitted. Views and practices that undermine and supplant the system of doctrine or polity of a confessional Church ought never to be tolerated. A Church that will not exercise discipline will not long be able to maintain pure doctrine or godly practice.

    When a denomination will not exercise discipline and its courts have become heterodox or disposed to tolerate error, the minority finds itself in the anomalous position of being submissive to a tolerant and erring majority. In order to proclaim the truth and to practice the discipline which they believe obedience to Christ requires, it then becomes necessary for them to separate. This is the exercise of discipline in reverse. It is how we view our separation.

    Some of our brethren have felt that the present circumstances do not yet call for such a remedy. They remain in the Presbyterian Church in the United States. We trust they will continue to contend for the faith, though our departure makes their position more difficult. We express to them our hope that God will bless their efforts, and that there may come a genuine spiritual awakening in the Presbyterian Church in the United States.

    We trust that our departure may cause those who control and direct the programs and policies of the Presbyterian Church in the United States to reexamine their own position in the light of the Word. Our prayer is that God may use this movement to promote spiritual awakening, not only in the new Church, but also in that from which we have separated. If in the providence of God, such were to occur, we would gladly acknowledge that the grounds for separation and division would have to be reassessed.

    We declare also that we believe the system of doctrine found in God’s Word to be the system known as the Reformed Faith. We are committed without reservation to the Reformed Faith as set forth in the Westminster Confession and Catechisms. It is our conviction that the Reformed faith is not sectarian, but an authentic and valid expression of Biblical Christianity. We believe it is our duty to seek fellowship and unity with all who profess this faith. We particularly wish to labor with other Christians committed to this theology. We further renew and reaffirm our understanding of the nature and mission of the Church. We have declared that Christ is King and only Law-giver in Zion. He has established the Church. His Church is a spiritual reality. As such it is made up of all the elect from all ages. This spiritual entity is manifested visibly upon the earth.

    The Church visible is found wherever there are those who profess the true faith together with their children. As an assembly of those who do so profess this faith, we have established this denomination in the belief that it is a true branch of the Christian Church.

    We believe the Church in its visible aspect is still essentially a spiritual organism. As such, its authority, motivation and power come from Christ, the Head, who is seated at the right hand of God. He has given us His rulebook for the Church, namely, the Word of God written. We understand the task of the Church to be primarily declarative and ministerial, not legislative or magisterial. It is our duty to set forth what He has given us in His Word and not to devise our own message or legislate our own laws.

    We declare that the ultimate purpose of the Church is to glorify God. We believe this includes giving top priority to Christ’s Great Commission. We reaffirm the substance of the position taken by the founding fathers of our former Church regarding the mission of the Church:

    We desire distinctly and deliberately to inscribe on our Church’s banner, as she now unfurls it to the world, in immediate subservience to the authority of our Lord as Head and King of the Church His last command: “Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you, and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.” We regard this as the great end of our organization, and obedience to it, as the indispensable condition of our Lord’s promised presence. It is the one great comprehensive objective, a proper conception of whose grandeur and magnitude is the only thing which, under the constraining love of Christ, can ever sufficiently arouse our energies and develop our resources so as to cause us to carry on with that vigor and efficiency, which true loyalty to our Lord demands, those other agencies necessary to our internal growth and prosperity at home.”

    As a Church, we consciously seek to return to the historic Presbyterian view of Church government. We reaffirm in the words of that earlier "Address to All Churches" the following:
    “The only thing that will be at all peculiar to us is the manner in which we shall attempt to discharge our duty. In almost every department of labor, except the pastoral care of congregations, it has been usual for the Church to resort to societies more or less closely connected with itself, and yet logically and really distinct. It is our purpose to rely upon the regular organs of our government, and executive agencies directly and immediately responsible to them. We wish to make the Church, not merely a superintendent, but an agent. We wish to develop the idea that the congregation of believers, as visibly organized is the very society or corporation which is divinely called to do the work of the Lord. We shall, therefore, endeavor to do what has never been adequately done--- bring out the energies of our Presbyterian system of government. From the session to the Assembly, we shall strive to enlist all our courts, as courts, in every department of Christian effort. We are not ashamed to confess that we are intensely Presbyterian. We embrace all other denominations in the arms of Christian fellowship and love, but our own scheme of government we humbly believe to be according to the pattern shown in the Mount, and, by God’s grace, we propose to put its efficiency to the test."
    As this new member of the family of Churches of the Lord Jesus Christ comes into being, we necessarily profess the Biblical doctrine of the unity of all who are in Christ. We know that what happens in one portion of His Church affects all of the Body of Christ. We covet the prayers of all Christians that we may witness and serve responsibly. We desire to pursue peace and charity with love towards fellow Christians throughout the world.

    To the Presbyterian Church in the United States, in particular, we express our continued love and concern. You are our spiritual mother, in your arms we were nurtured, under your ordinances we were baptized, in your courts we were ordained to serve our Lord and King, and to your visible organization we thought we had committed our lives. We sever these ties only with deepest regret and sorrow. We hope that our going may in some way recall you to that historic witness which we cherish as our common heritage.

    We greet all believers in an affirmation of the bonds of Christian brotherhood. We invite into ecclesiastical fellowship all who maintain our principles of faith and order.

    We now commend ourselves to God and the Word of His power. We devoutly pray that the Church catholic may be filled afresh with the Holy Spirit, and that she may speedily be stirred up to take no rest until the Lord accomplishes His Kingdom, making Zion a praise in the whole earth.

    December 7, 1973

    Tuesday, September 7, 2010

    A Letter to Elders in the PCA

    Many of you know that lately, I have been posting on the History and Forming of the PCA.  Many of those posts dealt with the issue of Church Property.  The following was sent to me via email concerning the PCA today!

    This is a letter to fellow presbyters from Rev. Todd Allen, an honorably retired teaching elder from Northwest Georgia Presbytery. In this letter he urges Presbyteries to vote against the BCO 14 amendments that were sent to Presbyteries by the 38th General Assembly. TE Allen was the pastor of the Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church in Savannah, Ga., from 1962-1974, during the time frame he refers to in his narrative when the church withdrew from the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUS) and went through years of litigation to keep the property.

    Please forward to other elders.

    Dear Brothers,

    Property is power! We fought long and hard through 3 1/2 years of litigation to keep church property rights for PCUS congregations. Those property rights were written into the Book of Church Order when we formed the Continuing Presbyterian Church (Now the Presbyterian Church in America in December of 1973 at the Briarwood Presbyterian Church in Birmingham, Alabama.

    We once believed without question that we had local church property rights in the Presbyterian Church in the United States. Those rights were challenged in 1966 when two Savannah churches (Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church and Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Church) voted on April 17, 1966 to withdraw from the PCUS over departures from the PCUS constitution. The Savannah Presbytery then named an Administrative Commission to defrock the two ministers and the ruling elders of both churches and install presbytery appointed ministers and sessions.

    The two churches obtained a court injunction to stop the presbytery from assuming this original jurisdiction and taking over the government and property of the two churches. The presbytery then went to the Superior Court of Chatham County and declared that they were justified in assuming original jurisdiction because there was an implied trust on church property in favor of the PCUS presbytery.

    The two churches therefore had to prove to a twelve member jury that the PCUS had violated its trust by departing from its constitution.. The jury unanimously ruled in favor of the two churches and awarded them rights to their church property. The presbytery then appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court and in a unanimous decision that court also awarded the property to the two local churches.

    The presbytery then appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court. That court took the case and in a unanimous decision remanded the case back to the Georgia Supreme Court, stating on remand that civil courts are proper forums to adjudicate church property disputes but that they cannot determine church doctrine. The Supreme Court enunciated three neutral principles for courts to use in adjudicating church property disputes. The three neutral principles are as follows: (1) who holds the deeds to church property, (2) what does state law say, (3) what does the hierarchical church law say.

    Following that Supreme Court remand the Georgia Supreme Court determined that the two Savannah churches satisfied all three neutral principles that the Supreme Court had been enunciated and in a second unanimous decision awarded the church property to the two local congregations. The Georgia Supreme Court also struck down a Georgia statue known as Mack vs. Kime that had given church hierarchies an implied trust vested interest in the property of its connectional congregations.

    The Savannah Presbytery then again appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In January of 1970 the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari, thus ending 3 1/2 years of litigation.

    Dominic Aquila has written a very important and incisive article on the inherent possibility of a civil court ruling that there is a hierarchal civil connection between PCA church courts if BCO 14 amendments are adopted. This would very likely result in a loss of local church control of its church property. He recommends that these BCO amendments be defeated. I certainly concur with him.

    Please take time to read Dominic Aquila's article below before voting on the BCO 14 Amendments.


    Your brother in Christ,

    Todd W. Allen
    PCA Honorably Retired Minister
    Midway PCA Pastor Emeritus

    Friday, September 3, 2010

    The Forming of the PCA: Part 11

    Read Part 1.
    Read Part 2.
    Read Part 3.
    Read Part 4.
    Read Part 5.
    Read Part 6.
    Read Part 7.
    Read Part 8.
    Read Part 9.
    Read Part 10.

    There are many questions circulating out there by some elders of the PCA concerning the future of our denomination. Since this is a Pastoral blog, I believe it a good thing to look back at some of the writings of the fathers of our denomination as they were nearing the end of the PCUS and considering themselves what was to become of their own denomination, which in the end led to the formation of the PCA.  I believe we can learn from them, and so the following is Part 11 of this little series looking back to 'the fathers of the PCA.'  Please take time to read the entirety though it is long for a blog.  Trust me this is crucial.  

    December 4, 1973 
    Opening Worship Message of the Newly Formed "The National Presbyterian Church"
    (Later Changed to "The Presbyterian Church in America")
    By W. Jack Williamson

    On this historic occasion, we gather at the call of Almighty God. We gather in the providence of our Father who art in heaven. We gather to worship and honor our Creator. Our chief end is "to glorify Him and to enjoy Him forever."

    We gather to continue a True branch of the Church and the sole law giver in Zion. We remember His promise that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

    Let us immediately declare the purpose of this Church, our portion of which today becomes a formal ecclesiastical entity. This Church exists merely for the sake of God. Its purpose cannot be human or humanistic as to prepare a believer for heaven. Its purpose does not like in us, but in God, and in the glory of His name. The origin of this Church is in God, its form of manifestation is from God; and from beginning to end, its purpose is and shall be to magnify God's glory.

    Let us further declare its nature. This Church is a spiritual organism, including heaven and earth, but having at present its center and the starting point for its action, not upon earth, but in heaven. We are in this world but not of this world. We declare our devotion to the Church as a spiritual institution knowing that the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ is not of this world. Not until His second coming shall this organism manifest itself as the center of the cosmos. Now, here on earth, it is only as it were its silhouette that can be dimly discerned. In the future, this new Jerusalem shall descend from God, out of heaven, but at present it withdraws its beams from our sight in the mysteries of the invisible. And therefore the true sanctuary is now above. On high are both the Altar of Atonement, and the incense Altar of Prayer; and on high is Christ, as the only priest who, according to the ordinance of Melchizedek, ministers at the Altar, in the sanctuary, before God. We confess that Christ in human form, in our flesh, has entered into the invisible, and that with Him, around Him, and in Him, our Head, is the real Church, the real and essential sanctuary of our salvation.

    But who are we who gather to form and continue on the earth a visible branch of the true invisible Church? We have been chosen, regenerated and called by God for this purpose. We are convinced and convicted of our calling and election by these words of the Apostle Paul:
    "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,  to the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence; having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself: that in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: in whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: that we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ." (Ephesians 1:3-12)
    We are but a group of sinners saved by grace and sent out to be ambassadors for our Savior Jesus Christ on this earth. We are a group of confessors who shall live in an ecclesiastical union of obedience to the ordinances of Christ Himself. This is no mystical, spiritual order gifted with mystical powers to operate with a magical influence on men. We are only regenerated and confessing individuals, who in accordance with scriptural command, are forming a society and therein shall endeavor to live in subordination to Christ our King. We are called to be a visible manifestation of the true Church on this earth. The Church of Jesus Christ is not a building, not an institution, not a spiritual order; but it is a group of living stones built on Jesus Christ as the cornerstone. We are then a group of regenerated and confessing individuals who have been united, not as we have seen fit, but according to the ordinances of Christ. We are a priesthood of believers. Do not misunderstand me. I do not say: This Church consists of a number of pious people united in groups for religious purposes. It is true that the real, heavenly, invisible church must and will manifest itself in the earthly church. But the real essential church is and remains the body of Christ which is composed of people who have been regenerated - "born again." Merely for pious, sincere people to get together in groups is not sufficient to form a true Church of Jesus Christ on earth. There you have a religious society but not a Christian Church. This is the great contradiction and danger of our generation in America. There are many religious societies in our land but far fewer real Christian churches. And Satan is using these religious societies to give a false sense of eternal security to their members. By them, many people are being misled into believing that to be "religious" is to be "Christian". People are being taught that to be "religious" and to be "Christian" are synonymous terms. We know this is tragic error. (sic) This is not to say that all these religious societies are bad. On the contrary most of them are good. For the most part they are composed of sincere people who are in varying degrees committed to a cause. Some are totally dedicated and give their lives to such causes. They exhibit zeal and courage in support of their cause. They are sincerely convinced that they are right. They use "Christian" terminology in support of their cause. They are philanthropic and altruistic. The results of their efforts often bring good to many people. But their causes are always humanistic and secularistic. Whatever movement is the vogue of the day becomes the cause of the year for these religious societies. Many Americans become members of these religious societies as a fashionable facet of the good life. They call themselves "Christians". In this they may be absolutely sincere but are certainly wrong. As proof that religious piety, sincerity, and zeal do not make a person a "Christian", we recall the autobiographical account of the life of the Apostle Paul. As Saul of Tarsus, he was deeply and sincerely religious. He was a zealous leader in the leading religious society of his day. but he tells us the he was certainly wrong. He did not become a "Christian" until the Living Lord Jesus encountered him in the road to Damascus. He was there "regenerated - born again"; and thereafter the proclamation of the gospel of Jesus Christ become his only cause. Paul testified to his mission before King Agrippa, as Dr. Luke recorded, in Acts 26:15-18 as follows:
    "And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, to open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me."
    Paul became a "Christian" through the regenerative power of a personal encounter with Jesus Christ; and thereafter he was called and sent forth as an ambassador of the gospel of Jesus Christ. He went about the then known world and preached this gospel and formed many true branches of the Church of Jesus Christ on this earth. This true church on earth then consists only of those who have been incorporated into Christ, who bow before Him, who live in His word, and who obey His ordinances. We do not claim to be perfect. Nor shall this Church be perfect. But we do assert that we have been chosen by His grace through faith to know Jesus the Christ as Savior; that we have been regenerated by the power of the Holy Spirit; that we have been called to proclaim His Word on this earth, to administer His sacraments to believers, and to exercise discipline in the body to preserve the purity of His Truth. As we stand before the face of Almighty God and know our hearts and minds, this is the necessity that is laid upon us. It is not that we would. It is that we must. Today we raise a fresh, clear banner of the truth of our Living Lord Jesus Christ before this watching world. It shall stand out distinctive in contrast to many false religious societies which bear His Name. It shall not be conformed to this world. It shall be a standard to which the "wise and the just may repair". Following in true apostolic tradition, we are but continuing a true branch of the Church of Jesus Christ on this earth. God being our helper, we can do no other.

    But to understand this necessity which we feel God has laid upon us, one must understand the principle that has motivated us. As an apologetic, we would lay this principle before the world. It is the practice of the principle of the purity of the visible church. In order that we might practice this principle, it has been necessary that we leave the visible church with which we have been associated. We have separated; but the principle is not separation. Separation is a negative idea. But our principle is a positive concept. Separation is merely the price we have had to pay for the principle is a positive concept. Separation is merely the price we have had to pay for the principle. It has been a terrible price. Many have had to "let goods and kindred go". This separation has forced division among families, friends, and local congregations. It has been heartrending and with many tears. Separation from foes is not easy; but separation from fellow Christian friends is traumatic. It was only after much prayer and with great sorrow and mourning that we concluded that to practice the principle of purity in the visible church, we had to pay the price of separation. Before we come to the place where we had to make this horrible decision to separate from our mother church, we had to settle a prior issue. That issue was that the church we loved as an organization is not first; Christ is first. Therefore, once Christ is no longer King and Lord in a church, then that church cannot have our loyalty. Long ago faithful men saw our former church losing her first love. Liberalism and modernism were beginning to make significant inroads in the Presbyterian Church in the United States by the mid-1940's. We cannot possibly give credit to all who in the past three decades have fought so valiantly to return that beloved Church to her true mission. Such Christian soldiers are legion. But we must mention some of the major groups which have sought to defend the faith once delivered to the saints. Over 25 years ago a group of men from the Presbyterian Journal met at the Biltmore Hotel in Atlanta, Georgia. We have recently read in the minutes of that body a list of the dangers they saw then before the Church. It was with prophetic insight that they wrote; fore every danger they listed, save one, is now an accomplished fact in the Presbyterian Church in the United States. Through these years the Presbyterian Journal has been the focal point of leadership for those who wished to preserve the historic witness of the Reformed Faith in the Presbyterian Church in the United States. We frankly admit today that we are a product of their original initiative. Most of us are novices in the battle compared to those veteran defenders of the faith. We honor and respect these men; and we give thanks to Almighty God for their gallant faithfulness. They have indeed led us to this place and this hour. Praise God for each of them.

    Then in the early 1960's, one man was called by God to begin in faith an independent evangelistic organization. Presbyterian Evangelistic Fellowship was born. These men have fearlessly preached the whole counsel of God as revealed in His Word. Many souls have been saved; and many quickened and nurtured in the faith. Praise God for each of them.

    Then in 1964, a group of laymen formed Concerned Presbyterians. This group was dedicated to return our beloved Church to its primary mission of winning souls to Jesus Christ and nurturing them in the faith. They sought to inform the church of the trends toward liquidation of her historic witness; and they sought to arrest such trends through constitutional process in the courts of the Church. Again God raised up one man to principally provide the leadership for this group.  He enlisted a number of full time field men who went over the length and breadth of the Church warning individuals and groups of these trends. Many of these soldiers of the cross are here today; but some have remained behind to conduct a rear guard action for the many uninformed sheep yet languishing in uncertainty or unconcern. The contribution of this group is incalculable. Praise God for each of them.

    Then in the late 1960s, over 600 ministers formed Presbyterian Churchmen United. They subscribed to a document they entitled "Declaration of Commitment" and published the same in full page advertisements in the leading newspapers in the South. They fearlessly took a stand for the faith. Many have suffered ecclesiastical persecution. The course any church takes is predominately set by her ordained ministry. In spite of the human threat of ecclesiastical oblivion, most of these faithful servants have stood firm out front in the vanguard. They too have led us to this place and this hour. Praise God for each of them.

    Finally, let us never forget those faithful who labored in lonely places - many times in almost total isolation. Let us pay tribute to those great prayer warriors in the homes across this land. Those women who prayed while we fought, who spent many lonely nights while we traveled, who gave up the best years of the lives of their men, who kept informed so that they could educate the men, who built fires under the session through their ruling elder husbands, and who deserve as much credit for this hour as any man here. Yes -- "they also serve, who only stand and wait." Praise God for each of them.

    For at least three decades, these and many more have attempted to stop the trends in the Presbyterian Church in the United States toward humanism, secularism, and syncretism. But their efforts failed. Our beloved former Church has continued the fetish for ecumenism so that the form of unity regardless of the faith has become its goal. She is already linked in constitutional principle with the UPCUSA through union presbyteries; and thus she has given approval to the doctrinal position of her sister body as expressed in the Confession of 1967. But her greatest deviation from her historic witness has been in her attitude toward the Scriptures. The true Church of Jesus Christ belongs to those who by the grace of God are faithful to the Scriptures. The higher critical theories of Scripture and the neo-orthodox view of Scripture have become the dominate and official position of the PCUS today. To them, the Bible is not the Word of God written - it merely contains the Word of God. To them, it is not absolute objective truth. For them, truth is subjective to the discovery of the mind of man. I believe it correct to assert that there is not one single professor in the four PCUS seminaries who holds to the doctrine of Scripture of our founding fathers. Men are consistently being ordained in PCUS Presbyteries who deny cardinal doctrines of Scripture. Universalism is being openly defended in the courts of the PCUS. As a result ethics and morality are determined by permissive situationalism. In his recent book "How Is The God Become Dim", Dr. Morton H. Smith has cataloged in over 200 pages this decline in the PCUS as reflected in its Assembly actions. It has been my observation that wherever and whenever the inspiration and authority of the Word Inscripturated is attacked, the person and work of the Word Incarnated is demeaned. The work of Jesus Christ in the world becomes equated with all the other noble causes laid before society. The zeal of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is lost and the temper of the times dictates the religious cause for the day. It appears to me that the PCUS is rapidly becoming such a religious society with tremendous potential for good community service but with only an incidental relationship to salvation of souls through faith in Jesus Christ.

    But you ask, why did you not practice the principle of the purity of the PCUS by disciplining those who deviated from the proper position in regard to the teaching of Scripture and tot he creeds? The answer is that the denomination is now so much in the hands o the liberals that it is officially and formally no longer possible to have a discipline trial, ever - even in theory! As we have pointed above, truth to the liberal is subjective and relative. Hence we have no standard o f objective truth on which to make a judgment. Since these men no longer believe in truth, any concept of discipline in regard to doctrine has been unthinkable. Instead of discipline, there has been substituted the policy of pluralism. It is the great umbrella principle of covering almost everybody regardless of belief. It is argued that the church is big enough to accommodate varying points of view. They say that in love we will tolerate each other. It is a live and let live philosophy. Each position has to make some compromise and concession to exist with the other. It is a tendency toward a growing latitudinarianism. This always leads to a low view of Scripture. And it gives to the watching world a multi-shaded view of Christianity. These may still talk about truth but tend less and less to practice truth. They practice tolerance, concession, compromise and accommodation. The world gets no clear and distinctive view of Jesus Christ in His Church. It is to restore this clear, distinctive, historic witness to Jesus Christ that we have felt constrained to separate from the PCUS.

    In a word, my reasoning is that my vows of ordination as a Ruling Elder, as I understand them, required me to separate from my beloved church. It is with genuine sadness, many tears, and much soul-searching that I cam to thus see my duty before my God. On ordination, I promised to study the peace, unity, and purity of teh Church. For a decade now I have diligently sought to fulfill this vow at various levels in the Church. I reluctantly concluded that I:
    (a) Could find little peace in a structure that in its official acts and doings is constantly and consistently contradicting my faith.
    (b) Could find little unity in a structure that advocates a pluralism and diversity that tolerates unbelief - for me "two cannot walk together less they be agreed."
    (c) Could find little edification in a structure that continues to embarrass me in its official acts and doings and forces me to spend most of my time in negative reaction and apology.
    (d) Could find little hope for purity in a structure that permits unbelief to run rampant and has lost its will and ability to discipline.
    Thus as I saw my duty, it is not that I wished to go but that I must. Others may see their duty differently. We must respect their views as "God alone is Lord of the conscience"; and we ask them to respect ours. We have thus made our decision. We settled the prior issue - Christ not Church is first. We tried to return the church to its true mission. we could not. After years of much intensive effort, it became obvious to us that humanly speaking it would be impossible to recapture our church. Instead of being able to stop these trends, they seemed to get worse as the liberals intensified their efforts in reaction to our opposition. Suffice it to say that several years ago it became the consensus of our leaders that the historic witness of our beloved Church was gradually being liquidated; and for those who felt a duty to preserve it, division became the only answer. From that point in time on the issue of division has been settled; and the only issue has been timing and procedure. It was then we sought a method of peaceful realignment hoping that men of good will would prevail. Not the only but the best method for such peaceful realignment seemed to be an acceptable escape clause in the plan of union with the UPCUSA. Our liberal friends promised this method; and we accepted their promises in good faith. But in February this year, they succeeded in closing this door by discarding the draft of the Plan of Union which they had promised would be presented to the 1973 General Assemblies for vote; and thus they delayed presentation of any plan indefinitely. Thus this method for constitutional division became no longer a viable possibility for the foreseeable future. The abandonment of this method by the liberals was an act of pure ecclesiastical expediency. They broke faith with us and forced us to move to an alternative procedure. Once the battle for doctrinal purity was lost, we were forced to decide what price we were willing to pay to practice the principle of purity in the visible church. We found it necessary to leave the visible organization with which we had been associated to preserve the principle. Separation became the price we had to pay to maintain the principle. But note well: We did so with tears - not with drums playing and flags flying. We claim empathy with the Rev. Dr. Thornwell who addressed the first General Assembly of our separated forefathers in 1861 with these matchless words:
    "We should be sorry to be regarded by our brethren in any part of the world as guilty of schism. We are not conscious of any purpose to rend the body of Christ. On the contrary, our aim has been to promote unity of the Spirit in the bonds of peace. If we know our own hearts, and can form any just estimate of the motives which have governed us, we have been prompted by a sincere desire to promote the glory of God, and the efficiency, energy, harmony and zeal of His visible kingdom in the earth. We have separated from our brethren as Abraham from Lot, because we are persuaded that the interest of true religion will be more effectually subserved by two independent churches...
    For the sake of peace, therefore, for Christian charity, for honor of the Church, and for the glory of God, we have been constrained, as much as in us lies, to remove all occasion of offense. We have quietly separated, and we are grateful to God that, while leaving for the sake of peace, we leave it with the humble consciousness that we ourselves have never given occasion to break the peace."
    Now having declared our purpose and the nature of this church, and having explained who we believe we are and the principle which has motivated us, we would again state the commitment which binds us. We have committed ourselves to the rebirth and continuation of a Presbyterian Church loyal to Scripture, the Reformed Faith and committed to the spiritual mission of the Church as Christ commanded in the Great Commission. For us in the Bible is both necessary and sufficient. Apart from Scripture man is hopelessly lost. Created in the image of God, man has fallen and darkness has engulfed him. Man in sin is not only spiritually ill, he is spiritually dead. He is not only confused in his pilgrimage through this world; he is lost. He is like a person in a forest, without a map, compass or guide and no idea which way to go. To be sure, there is revelation in creation. God continues to speak to all men in spite of their sin, but the consequences of sin are such that men cannot hear. Other sounds distract them and drown out the call of God. They hear His call but indistinctly. The calls of the world and self are too strong. Without some leading, they will never find their way to the Father's house. That is why salvation from God is necessary. Apart from it, the Apostle Paul declares in shocking language that men are "separated from Christ, alienated from the common wealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world" (Ephesians 2:12).Thus we declare the necessity of Regeneration for real existence and of Revelation for clear consciousness. Thus we see the Necessitas Sola Scripture, i.e. of the need of scriptural revelation. To abandon or depreciate Scripture is tantamount to abandonment or depreciation of Christianity itself. In paradise in the Garden of Eden before the fall there was no Bible; and there will be no Bible in the future Paradise of glory. But in our present condition our immediate communion with God is lost. When the sun shines in your house, bright and clear, you turn off the electric light, but when the sun sets, this artificial light is kindled in every dwelling. So it is in our religion. When there is no mist to hide the majesty of the divine light from our eyes, what need is there for a lamp unto our feet or a light upon our pathway? But when history, experience and consciousness all unite in stating the fact that the pure light of Heaven has disappeared, and that we are groping in the dark, then a different, or if you will allow the analogy, an artificial light must be kindled for us in His Holy Word. God regenerates us - that is to say, He rekindles in our heart the lamp sin has blown out. The necessary consequence of this regeneration is an irreconcilable conflict between the inner world of our heart and the world outside. Now, in the Bible, God reveals, to the regenerate, a world of thought, a world of energies, a world of full and beautiful life, which stands in direct opposition to this ordinary world, but proves to agree in a wonderful way with the new life that has sprung up in our heart. It is our only infallible rule of faith and practice, in the accepted and ordinary meaning of these terms. We believe that the Holy Scriptures fully contain the will and word of God and that whatsoever man ought to believe unto salvation and sanctification are taught therein. We shall not consider any other writings of men, however holy these men may have been, of equal value with those of divine Scripture. Nor shall we consider custom, traditions, councils or decrees as of equal value with the truth of God as found in the Scripture, since that truth is above all. The Word of God written is without error and our final authority. We are committed to a church loyal to Scripture. We are committed to a church loyal to the Reformed Faith - Ecclesia Reformata. By this we mean a church that has been renewed according to the Word of God. We shall attempt to recover Christianity in its original purity and to remove from it the beliefs and practices that have become attached to it in our day and generation without foundation in the Word of God. We acknowledge that this can only be accomplished by the Spirit of God. So we pray that His Holy Spirit shall so fully indwell us that this faith is clearly and comprehensively systematized in the subordinate standards which are the Westminster Confession of Faith and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms. We make no apology that this church will be thoroughly Calvinistic in doctrine and intensely Presbyterian in form of government. In the tradition of our forebears, we affirm with Rev. Dr. Thornwell that
    "the ends which we propose to accomplish as a church are the same as those which are proposed by every other church - to proclaim God's truth as a witness to the nations; to gather His elect from the four corners of the earth, and through the Word, ministers and ordinances, to train them for eternal life."
    We have heard the voice of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ when He commissioned us for the primary mission of His Church, namely:
    "Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world" (Matthew 28:19-20)
    Confident of the promise of His presence, we shall endeavor to strive for a new obedience to this great commission.

    Having thus declared ourselves and our commitment, we would address specific groups of people with whom we shall have contact in our mission. For the purpose of illustration, we will liken our approach to five concentric circles. Each group shall be a different circle. From outside to inside, the circle of groups are:
    1. All people of the world.
    2. All the churches of Jesus Christ through the earth.
    3. The Reformed Family of churches of Jesus Christ.
    4. The Presbyterian Church in the United States.
    5. Our Brethren in this Church.
    For all the people of the world, we have this good news:
    "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3:16)
    God loves you. It is not his desire that any of you should perish. He sent Jesus Christ His Son to this earth that you might be reconciled to God through faith in His Son. Jesus gave his life on the cross as an atonement for sin. This sacrifice was sufficient for all of you. God calls you to repent and believe this gospel. There is no other way to heaven. No man can come God the Father except through God the Son. The alternative is eternal damnation in hell separated from God. We shall and do proclaim God's truth to you regardless of your race, color, creed or national origin. Repent and believe the gospel.

    To all the churches of Jesus Christ throughout the earth, we send greetings in the ties of Christian brotherhood and common mission. We desire to cultivate peace and charity with our fellow Christians throughout the world. We believe and profess one holy catholic and apostolic church. Our Westminster Confession beautifully sets forth this heavenly all-embracing nature of the church, when it says:
    "The Catholic or Universal Church, which is invisible, consists of the whole number of the elect that have been , are or shall be, gathered into one, under Christ the Head, thereof; and is the spouse, the body, the fullness of Him the filleth all in all."
    Thus the church is Catholic or Universal because there is only one church; and it is Apostolic because it has direct continuity with the church of the first century. It is indeed built upon the foundation of the apostles and the prophets with Jesus Christ himself its chief cornerstone. it is the view held by some zealous Christians that theirs is the only true church, or that their members are superior to Christians in other churches. We do not hold this narrow concept. We would distinguish between mere religious societies that often bear the name "Christian" and the true churches of Jesus Christ on the earth. But we declare that the visible unity of the true body of Christ, though obscured , is not destroyed by its division into different denominations of professing Christians; but all of these which maintain the Word and Sacraments in their fundamental integrity are to be recognized as true branches of the Church of Jesus Christ on this earth. In His matchless name we greet you as brothers in Christ.

    To the Reformed Family of Churches of Jesus Christ, we extend special greetings. We share with you the sharp accent on Jesus Christ as the heart of our tradition and the foundation of our ecclesiology. We share the view that the church is not only an organism, a fellowship of believers united to Christ, but it is also an institution in society. Like other social institutions it has certain distinguishing characteristics. These have been called "marks". Where these were in evidence the church was called a "true church" and where they were not it was called a "false church" or a "sect". We know you agree that these "marks" are:
    1. that the church must preach the gospel,
    2. that the church must properly administer the sacraments as instituted by Christ, and 
    3. that the church must exercise discipline in order to preserve the honor of Jesus Christ, the head of the church.
    Since you agree with us on the major points of doctrine and polity, we seek great possibilities for closer ties in the future. We seek the "oneness" of which Jesus spoke in John Chapter 17. We are convinced that there must be a unity of faith before a unity of form. We appreciate the assistance and encouragement you have already given us. We look forward to a closer relationship with you. We see in our mutual relationship the seeds of true ecumenicity. May God hasten the day.

    To the Presbyterian Church in the United States, we acknowledged our continued love and concern for you. You are our spiritual mother, in your arms we were nurtured, under your ordinances we were baptized, in your courts we were ordained to serve our Lord and King, and to your visible organization we thought we had committed our lives. We could sever these ties only with deepest regret. We have done that which we think our duty demanded. We have done that which we think the honor of Jesus Christ required. We sincerely hope that our going may in some way recall you to that historic witness which we cherish as our common heritage. It is our prayer that God will use these days for self-examination and reform. Any such separation is traumatic; but in word and deed we have attempted to show Christian charity for the sake of peace, for the honor of the Church, and for the glory of God. Without question, the most painful aspect of this separation has been to leave the communion with many fellow believers with whom we have stood shoulder to should in the ecclesiastical battles of the last three decades. We believe we have moved as Christian statesmen with honor. We know you agree with us in principle but disagree as to procedure. We respect your right to your judgment before God. We would prefer that you were with us today. We feel that it is here that you belong. Your absence makes us feel incomplete. We covet your continued fellowship in all areas possible. There are so many times and places where we can continue our warm fellowship and friendship - both public and private; and for our part we shall continue to expedite and cultivate these opportunities. We now extend to you our hands of love and good will and our open invitation and plea to join us soon. May God hasten that day.

    To our Brethren in this Church, we rejoice with you in praise and thanksgiving to Almighty God for bring us to this hour. Surely His providence has taught us that we are in His will, under His control, and led by His Spirit. I counsel you that our attitude toward others is most important. Regardless of the attitudes or actions of others, we will remember that we represent the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the King and Head of the Church. As his ambassadors to the watching world, we must let this mind be in us which was in Christ Jesus. Let men everywhere notice in us the three effects to nearness to Jesus - humility, happiness and holiness. History teaches us that in prior church divisions, those who come out tend to become hard. They tend to become absolutists even in the lesser points of doctrine. Francis Schaeffer points out that
    "One must realize that there is a great difference between believing in absolutes and having an absolutist mentality about everything."
    True humility is the answer to this problem - for it is caused by thinking more highly of ourselves than we ought. Our Lord demonstrated the proper approach when he washed the disciples' feet on the night he was betrayed. Now I'm not advocating "foot-washing". But I am suggesting that we need the Holy Spirit to help us discern the difference between those things that are revealed in Scripture and those things that are the product of our human pride and opinion. In the former, we must not compromise; but in the latter, we must learn true humility to be in subjection to our brethren in the Lord. We must put away our former mentality of being suspicious of our fellow churchmen; and we must trust and believe our brothers until and unless they prove otherwise. Our Lord came to minister; and so must we. The grace of humility should abound in us. Also happiness should pervade our existence. We should rejoice and be exceedingly glad. God has given to this select group an opportunity to witness to His Glory the likeness of which men have not had in many generations. What a privilege it is to have been born for such a time as this. We have the answer to life and to death - Christ is the answer. He came to give us the truly abundant life. Yes, there shall be trials and tribulations. But we should be of good cheer for He has overcome the world. We bear the name of "Christian." But we must realize that every moment of every day, we stand in the presence of God with the latin expression Coram Deo. We have a living encounter with our Creator. Before Ahab and Jezebel, the lone prophet Elijah exclaimed "As the Lord, the God of Israel lives before whom I stand." As individuals this concept that our whole existence is lived before the Lord forms the foundation for our holiness. Remember that perhaps of Christ the world's only view shall be what they see of Him in you.

    Then, brethren, in conclusion we must under gird this Church with a great outgoing of prayer. We know it is far easier to fight than it is to pray. But our battle is "not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rules of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Only fervent prayer will prevail.

    We must work. Remember that the true war-cry of the church is Gideon's watch word - "The Sword of the Lord, and of Gideon." God must do it; but we are not to be idle. If we only cry "the Sword of the Lord," we shall be guilty of an idle presumption; and if we should cry "the Sword of Gideon" alone, we shall manifest an idle reliance on an arm of flesh. We must blend the two. We can do nothing ourselves, but we can do everything by the help of our God.

    We must be confident of His promise. To the chosen children of Israel, the prophet Isaiah wrote the words of God that I believe apply to us, namely:
    "You worry at being so small and few, but Abraham was only one when I called him. But I blessed him and he became a great nation" (Isaiah 51:2)
    What a promise! What a God!
    "And now we command you to this God and the word of His grace. We devoutly pray that the whole Catholic Church may be afresh baptized with the Holy Ghost, and that she may be speedily stirred to give the Lord no rest until He establish and make Jerusalem a praise in the earth." "For of Him, and through Him, and to Him are all things: To whom be glory forever. Amen" (Romans 11:36)

    Followers

      © Blogger template 'Personal Blog' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

    Back to TOP