Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Pray Without Ceasing!

"Rejoice always; pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus." - 1 Thessalonians 5:17
"Christians who are much in secret prayer, and in meditation and contemplation, rather than they who are more in hearing, reading and conference, are men of greatest life and joy, because they are nearer the source of the fountain, and have all more immediately from God Himself." - Richard Baxter
My brothers and sisters, do not let up in your prayers but pour more of yourself to it.  Do you know how prideful you are?  That you, in your practice, live as though you are a god.  Because you lack in falling to your knees and crying out to the Lord, you act as one who is superior and lord, and yet quite the opposite is true.  You are weak, sinful, and unworthy and thus in all we do, we need to come before the Lord, seeking Him and His wisdom, righteousness, love, and grace.  When you get into your car to drive somewhere, who is governing your vehicle and your body?  Who sends the weather and maintains the roads?  The same questions can be posed for all of life.  The answer is the Lord God Almighty, maker of the heavens and the earth. Fly to Him often and you will be carried along by His grace. 


Tuesday, February 16, 2010

38th PCA General Assembly (2010): Overtures 3-5, 8

Already, we have covered Overtures 1 and 2, but now we turn to some more overtures which have just made an appearance on the PCA General Assembly website. 

Overtures 3 and 4 concern the desire to expand or revise boundaries of presbyteries.  These overtures won't even go before the Overtures Committee, but sometimes it is interesting to look at.  Overture 4 comes from Central Georgia Presbytery and doesn't seem like anything out of the ordinary to receive two more countries from Savannah River Presbytery, who also overtured the General Assembly with Overture 8 to confer with  Overture 4.  Overture 3 though is of some interest to me.  The Pacific Northwest Presbytery is asking that all of Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho be included in their presbytery. Sometimes I wonder why presbyteries like Pacific Northwest don't break up into two different presbyteries, especially considering the distance needed to travel and the number of churches already in the presbytery (currently given that this overture will probably be approved, there will be 29 churches, including mission works, in the presbytery).  

Now you see presbyteries this large in other parts of the country like my own, Mississippi Valley Presbytery, which has over 30.  However, my presbytery is very small in size geographically, which allows everyone to be able to drive not too far to get to each presbytery meeting.  Rocky Mountain Presbytery has 28 churches in Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana.  Logically, you would think that Montana having 5 churches, Wyoming having 3 churches, and Idaho having 1 that they would want to become their own presbytery.  I wonder why that wasn't what happened.  

But that is very minor compared to Overture 5.  Let us move on...quickly!  Stepping off my soapbox onto another, we come to Covenant Presbytery's Overture that will go before the Overtures Committee.  Here is the overture:
Whereas, the 37th General Assembly amended the language of BCO 59-1 and 59-6 to read:
59-1. Marriage is a divine institution though not a sacrament, nor peculiar to the Church of Christ. It is proper that every common wealth, for the good of society, make laws to regulate marriage, which all citizens are bound to obey insofar as they do not transgress the laws of God (Acts 5:29).
59-6. Marriage is of a public nature. The welfare of society, the happiness of families, and the credit of Christianity, are deeply interested in it. Therefore, the purpose of marriage should be sufficiently published a proper time previously to the solemnization to it. It is enjoined on all ministers to be careful that, in this matter, they obey the laws of the community to the extent that those laws do not transgress the laws of God as interpreted by the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church in America; and that they may not destroy the peace and comfort of families, ministers should be assured that, with respect to the parties applying to them, no just objections lie against their marriage;
and
 Whereas, the BCO 26-2 currently reads:
26-2. Amendments to the Book of Church Order may be made only in the following manner:
1. Approval of the proposed amendment by majority of those present and voting in the General Assembly, and its recommendation to the Presbyteries.
2. The advice and consent of two-thirds (2/3) of the Presbyteries.
3. The approval and enactment by a subsequent General Assembly by a majority of those present and voting; and
and
Whereas, the General Assembly voted to change the language of BCO 59-1 and 59-6 contrary to the specifications laid out in BCO 26-2; and

Whereas, the General Assembly made such changes on the grounds that BCO 59-1 and 59-6 were non-binding sections of the BCO; and
Whereas, our desire is for unanimity and clarity in the manner by which we amend our Book of Church Order;
Therefore be it resolved that BCO 26-2 be amended as follows (new text in bold and underlined):
26-2. Amendments to any portion of the Book of Church Order, whether constitutionally binding or not, may be made only in the following manner:
1. Approval of the proposed amendment by majority of those present and voting in the General Assembly, and its recommendation to the Presbyteries.
2. The advice and consent of two-thirds (2/3) of the Presbyteries.
3. The approval and enactment by a subsequent General Assembly by a majority of those present and voting.
Rationale:
The definition of which portions of the Book of Church Order must be amended according to the procedure outlined in 26-2 is clearly ambiguous, as demonstrated by the actions of the 37th General Assembly. Therefore, the above overture seeks to remove this ambiguity, and give clarification and re-affirmation to the manner by which any portion of the Book of Church Order may be amended.
Look now at the Rationale.  This amendment to the BCO is being called for because of actions of the 37th General Assembly.  I hope this is a good post for elders because of what happened last year.  Last year, the Moderator made a mistake.  And to clarify, I am not thinking the Moderator did it on purpose.  I personally think he didn't know what he was doing and/or had done when the overture from Central Carolina Presbytery came a second time to the floor after having been sent back to the Overtures Committee to amend BCO 56 on marriage.  The overture called for the 56th chapter to become constitutionally binding and not just 'a suggestion'.  Because of this, there were some who wanted the language fined tuned more before it became constitutionally binding.  There were others who thought the language was already fine.  And yet still others, who thought that the Assembly needed to act now because of BCO 26-2 that would at least take one more year to get this to become a reality.  

But in the midst of it all, we as an Assembly, acted contrary to BCO 26-2.  You see BCO 26-2, sections 2 and 3?  Yeah, we basically bipassed those and when the overture came back from the Overtures commitee we approved it.  If memory serves me, the vote we had somehow made the BCO change right then and not go to the presbyteries (section 2) and not come back this year at the 38th GA (section 3).  And it was because of one little mistake by the Moderator. 

And so this year, Covenant Presbytery is coming with an overture to change the BCO where the mistake was made to make it more clear.  I don't know what I think about this overture, to change BCO 26-2.   I'm not a lawyer or anything but I like what Covenant Presbytery wants out of this, to have the General Assembly do what it is supposed to when it comes to BCO amendments.  However, right now I think the BCO is already clear.  In the Rationale, it says that it is clearly ambiguous, but I will have to disagree.  I think it is very easy to understand.  That's why there were many after the decision of the Moderator last year who were in a hub-bug.  Because they knew BCO 26-2 (that is one of the main things you learn before ordination for your exams).  Everyone knew it was wrong because the BCO is clear. 

It says, "Amendments to any portion of the Book of Church Order, whether constitutionally binding or not, may be made only in the following manner:"  To add the Bold and Underlined portions, really doesn't add much of anything.  That is already clear in the fine print.  So I think at this time, I would have to vote against this Overture even though I agree with what the people of this overture want out of it.  What needs to happen is for elders to stand up and make a complaint (BCO 43) when a court makes a mistake.  We can do something when we see mistakes and yet last year no one did anything.  May this be a learning experience for us all.  Whether you are a member of your church, an elder, member of presbytery, or a delegate to General Assembly, know what is supposed to happen and what you are able to do in your Church, at Presbytery, and at General Assembly.  In other words, read and know the Book of Church Order.  In doing so, you will be faithfully maintaining the peace and purity of the Church.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Hello, World

It's good to join a team with like-minded Reformed pastors, and I'm grateful to Andrew for the invitation to participate. My main concern in posting here will be the organic connection between doctrine and practice. One cannot have the one without the other. I intend to show that doctrine is practical, and good practice cannot help but be doctrinal. The gap between doctrine and practice is due mostly to the Enlightenment, not to anything biblical, and certainly not to anything Reformed. The Enlightenment, especially as Kant saw it, produced a separation of the mind and the heart, or between the spiritual and the physical. As a result, everything has become more and more fragmented in our societies. And one of the biggest and baddest separations has been the one between doctrine and practice.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

A Call To Attend The Prayer Meeting

Take great heed to these words, which come from a sermon by Charles Spurgeon on Zechariah 8:21.


"And the inhabitants of one city shall go to another, saying, Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of hosts: I will go also." - Zechariah 8:21

One of the first signs of God’s Presence among a people is that THEY TAKE GREAT INTEREST IN DIVINE WORSHIP. “The inhabitants of one city shall go to another, saying, Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of Hosts.” It is clear from this that they no longer despise assemblies for worship and no longer count Divine service to be a weariness. On the contrary, they begin to value the means of Grace and desire to make good use of them. The first solemn assembly mentioned here is the Prayer Meeting and certainly one of the surest tokens of a visitation of God’s Spirit to a community is their delighting to meet for prayer.  The first cry of the people mentioned in our text was, “Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord.” It is no statement of mine, suggested by unreasonable zeal, but it is the result of long-continued observation when I assert that the condition of a Church may be very accurately gauged by its Prayer Meetings. 

If the spirit of prayer is not with the people, the minister may preach like an angel, but he cannot expect success. If there is not the spirit of prayer in a Church there may be wealth, there may be talent, there may be a measure of effort, there may be an extensive machinery, but the Lord is not there. It is a sure evidence of the Presence of God that men pray as the rising of the thermometer is an evidence of the increase of the temperature.

As the Nilometer measures the rising of the water in the Nile, and so foretells the amount of harvest in Egypt, so is the Prayer Meeting a “Graceometer,” and from it we may judge of the amount of Divine working among a people. If God is near a Church it must pray. And if He is not there, one of the first tokens of His absence will be slothfulness in prayer. God’s people, by their saying one to another, “Let us go speedily to pray,” manifest that they have a sense of their needs—they feel that they need much, much that Nature cannot yield them—they feel their need of Divine Grace, their need of quickening, their need of God’s help if sinners are to be converted. They feel their need of His help if even those who are saved are to be steadfast—their need of the Holy Spirit that they may grow in Grace and glorify God. He who never prays surely does not know his own needs and how can he be taught of the Lord at all? God’s people are a people sensible of their needs and therefore the absence of a sense of poverty is a sad token.

Moreover, the love which God’s people have for prayer shows their desire after heavenly things. Those who frequently meet together for importunate, wrestling prayer, practically show that they desire to see the Lord’s Kingdom come. They are not so taken up with their own business that they cannot afford time to think of God’s business. They are not so occupied with the world’s pleasures that they take no pleasure in the things of God. Believers in a right state of heart value the prosperity of the Church and, seeing that it can only be promoted by God’s own hand, they cry mightily unto the Lord of Hosts to stretch out His hand of mercy and to be favorable to His Church and cause.

Church members who never pray for the good of the Church have no love for it. If they do not plead for sinners they have no love for the Savior and how can they be truly converted persons? Such as habitually forsake the assembling of themselves together for prayer may well suspect the genuine character of their piety. I am not, of course, alluding to those who are debarred by circumstances, but I allude to those who, from frivolous excuses, absent themselves from the praying assemblies. How dwells the love of God in them? Are they not dead branches of the vine? May they not expect to be taken away before long? Earnest meetings for prayer, indeed, not only prove our sense of need and our desire for spiritual blessings, but they manifest most our faith in the living God, and our belief that He hears prayer, for men will not continue in supplication if they do not believe that God hears them. Sensible men would soon cease their prayers if they were not convinced that there is an ear which hears their petitions. Who would persevere in a vain exercise?

Our united prayers prove that we know that God is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. We know that the Lord is able to work according to our desires and that He is willing to be entreated of us. I have never known a thirsty man by a well who would not use the bucket which was there ready to hand unless, indeed, he was of the opinion that the well was dry. I have never known a man who wanted wealth and had a good trade, who would not exercise his trade. And so I have never known a man who believed prayer to be really effectual and felt his great needs who did not engage in prayer.

It is an ill token to any community of Christians when prayer is at a low ebb, for it is clear evidence that they do not know their own needs, they are not anxious about spiritual things and neither do they believe that God will enrich them in answer to their petitions. Beloved, may we never, as a Church, deserve censure for neglecting prayer! Our meetings for prayer have excited general astonishment by their number, but they are not all they might be. I shall put it to the conscience of each one to say whether you are as prayerful as you should be. Did you ever hear of a Church member who had not attended a Prayer Meeting for a month? Do you know of Church members who never assemble with the Brethren so much as once in a quarter of a year? Do you know of any who have not been to a Prayer Meeting in this place for the last six months? Do you know such?

I will not say I know any such. I will do no more than hint that such people may exist. But if you know them will you give them my Christian love and say that nothing depresses the pastor’s spirit like the absence of Church members from the public assemblies of prayer, and that if anything could make him strong in the Lord, and give him courage to go forward in the Lord’s work, it would be if all of you were to make the prayer meeting your special delight? I shall be satisfied when I see our prayer meetings as crowded as the services for preaching. And it strikes me if ever we are fully baptized into God’s Spirit, we shall arrive at that point. A vastly larger amount of prayer ought to be among us than at present and if the Lord visits us graciously He will set us praying without ceasing.

But next, these people also took an interest in meetings for instruction. I find that the Chaldee translates the second sentence, “Let us seek the doctrine of Jehovah of Hosts.” The Lord’s coming near to any people will be sure to excite in them a longing to hear the Word. God sends impulses of enquiry over men’s minds and suddenly places of worship become crowded which were half empty before. Preachers, also, who were cold and dead become quickened and speak with earnestness and life. No doubt waves of religious movement pass over nations and peoples—and when God comes to a people the crest of that wave will be seen in this form—that the kingdom of Heaven becomes an object of interest and men press unto it!

During the revival under John the Baptist, the people went in crowds into the wilderness to hear the strange preacher who bade them repent. The revival under the Apostles was marked by their everywhere preaching the Word and the people listening. This was the great token of the Reformation—meetings were held under Gospel Oaks, out upon the commons and away in lone houses—and in glens and woods men thronged to listen to the Word of God! The professionals of popery were forsaken for the simple preaching of the Truth of God! This also marked the last grand revival of religion in our own country under Whitfield and Wesley. The Word of the Lord was precious in those days.  And whether the Gospel was preached among the colliers of Kingswood or the rabble of Kennington Common, tens of thousands were awakened and rejoiced in the joyful notes of Free Grace.
Men loved to hear the Word—they said to one another, “Let us seek the Lord.” It is said that Moorfields would be full of light on a dark winter’s morning at five o’clock when Mr. Whitfield was to preach because so many people would be finding their way to the rendezvous, each one carrying a lantern. And so also over there in Zoar Street, in Southwark, when Mr. John Bunyan was out of prison and was going to preach, a couple of thousand would be assembled at five o’clock in the morning to enjoy his honest testimony.

Master Fox in his, “Acts and Monuments,” speaking of the time when the Reformation was breaking out, uses language something to this effect—“It was lovely to see their travels, earnest seeking, burning zeal, Bible reading, watching, sweet assemblies, resort of one neighbor to another for conference and mutual confirmation.” And, he adds, “All which may make us now to blush for shame in these, our days, of free profession.”

We may take the good man’s hint and feel shame for neglected opportunities, cold devotions and disregard of the Word of God. Our fathers loved to meet for prayer and to hear the preaching of the Truth of God. And when they came together it was with an intensely earnest desire to obtain the Divine blessing. To get this they risked life and liberty, meeting, even, when fine and imprisonment, or perhaps the gallows might be their reward. O to see the like earnestness among ourselves as to the means of Grace! May the Lord Jesus send it to us by the working of His Holy Spirit.

Another sign of God’s visiting a people in mercy is that THEY STIR EACH OTHER UP TO ATTEND UPON THE MEANS OF GRACE, for “the inhabitants of one city shall go to another, saying, Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord.”

That is to say, they did not merely ask one another to go if they casually met. They did not bring in the subject accidentally if they could do so readily in common conversation—but the inhabitants of one city went to another on purpose to exhort them! They made a journey about it. As men go to market, from town to town, so did these people try to open a market for Christ—and not only one messenger, but many of the inhabitants of one city went on purpose all the way to another city, with set design, to induce them to join in worship, saying, “Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord.”

They put themselves out of the way to do it. They had such a desire that great numbers might come together to worship the Most High that they took much trouble to invite their neighbors. God will be with us, indeed, if each one of us shall be anxious to bring others to Jesus, and to that end shall try to bring them to hearken to the Word of God. Why were these men so earnest? The reply will be, they persuaded others to come to the meetings for worship out of love to God’s House, to God’s cause, and to God Himself. God’s House is honored and beautified when great numbers come together. The ways of Zion do mourn and languish when but few assemble for prayer. Christ has promised to be where two or three are met together in His name. Still, it is not helpful to comfortable fellowship for a mere handful to meet in a large house. We feel like sparrows alone on the housetop when such is the case.  

Observe in our text there does not appear to have been any minister or missionary employed to go from one city to another, and to say, “Let us go and pray,” but the inhabitants, themselves, undertook the duty of invitation and persuasion, and said, “Let us go and pray unto the Lord.” The people, themselves, attended to mutual provocation to love and to good works! How I wish they did so now! They did not wait for the exhortations of one specially set apart to be a prompter and an organizer. But their own hearts were so warm that they did it spontaneously among themselves! My Brothers and Sisters, may you thus be pastors to one another! There are far too many of you for me to look after personally, therefore I pray you stir one another up to every good word and work.

I believe that when a man stirs others up it is good for himself, for a man cannot, in common decency, be very cold, himself, who bids others be warm. He cannot, surely, unless he is an arrant hypocrite, be negligent of those duties which he bids others attend to! Beloved, I commit this charge to you, and then I have done with this point. This morning I ask you to visit one another and to say, “Come, let us not as a Church lose the Presence of God after nearly 20 years’ enjoyment of it. Let not our minister’s hands grow weak by our neglect of prayer. Let not the work of the Church flag through our indifference, but let us make a brotherly covenant that we will go speedily to pray before the Lord and seek the Lord of Hosts, that we may retain His Presence and have yet more of it, to the praise of the glory of His Grace.”

I must pass on to notice that it appears from our text that it is a sure mark of God’s visiting a people, when THEY ARE URGENT TO ATTEND UPON THESE HOLY EXERCISES AT ONCE. The text says, “Let us go speedily to pray,” by which is meant, I suppose, that when the time came to pray, they were punctual, they were not laggards. They did not come into the assembly late. They did not drop in, one by one, long after the service had begun—but they said, “Let us go speedily.” They looked up to their clocks and said, “How long will it take us to walk so as to be there at the commencement? Let us start five minutes before that time lest we should not be able to keep up the pace and should, by any means, reach the door after the first prayer.”

I wish late comers would remember David’s choice. You remember what part he wished to take in the House of God? He was willing to be a doorkeeper and that not because the doorkeeper has the most comfortable berth, for that is the hardest post a man can choose. But he knew that doorkeepers are the first in and the last out and so David wished to be first at the service and the last at the going away! How few would be of David’s mind! It has been said that Dissenters in years gone by placed the clock outside the Meeting House so that they might never enter late. But the modern Dissenters place the clock inside, that their preachers may not keep them too long! There is some truth in the remark, but it is not to our honor.

This was, however, a fault with our forefathers, for quaint old Herbert said—“O be drest, stay not for th’ other pin: why you have lost a joy for it worth worlds.” Let us mend our ways and say, one to another, in the language of the text, “Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord.” Let us go with quick feet. If we go slowly to market, let us go quickly to Prayer Meeting. If we are slow on week days, let us go quickly on Sunday. Let us never keep Jesus Christ waiting and we shall do so if we are not on time, for He is sure to be punctual, even if only two or three are met together in His name. The expression, however, means more than this. “Let us go speedily” means, let us go heartily—do not let us crawl to prayer, but let us go to it as men who have something before them which attracts them.

When the angels serve God they never do it as though they were half asleep. They are all alive and burning like flames of fire. They have six wings and, I guarantee you, they use them all! When the Lord says, “Gabriel, go upon My bidding,” he outstrips the lightning! O, to exhibit some such ardor and zest in the service of God! If we pray, let us pray as if we mean it! If we worship, let us worship with our hearts. “Let us go speedily,” and may the Lord make our hearts to be like the chariots of Amminadib for swiftness and rapidity—glowing wheels and burning axles may God give to our spirits—that we may never let the world think we are indifferent to the love of Jesus. “Let us go speedily.”

The words, “Let us go speedily,” mean—let us go at once, or instantly. If any good thing has been neglected and we resolve to attend to it better, let us do it at once. Revivals of religion—when is the best time for them? Directly! When is the best time to repent of sin? Today! When is the best time for a cold heart to grow warm? Today! When is the season for a sluggish Christian to be industrious? Today! When is the period for a backslider to return? Today! When is the time for one who has crawled along the road to Heaven to mend his pace? Today! Is it not always today?

And, indeed, when should it be? “Tomorrow,” you say. Ah, but you may never have it! And, when it comes, it will still be today. Tomorrow is only in the fool’s almanac—it exists nowhere else. Today! Today, let us go speedily! I beseech the Church of God here to be yet more alive and at once to wake up. Time is flying—we cannot afford to lose it. The devil is wide awake, why should we be asleep? Error is stalking through the land, evil influences are abroad everywhere! Men are dying, Hell is filling, the grave is gorged and yet is insatiable—and the man of destruction is not yet satisfied. Shall we lie down in wicked satisfaction, yielding to base laziness? Awake, arise, you Christians! Now, even now, lest it be said of you, “Curse you Meroz, says the Lord, curse you bitterly the inhabitants thereof, because they came not to the help of the Lord, to the help of the Lord against the mighty.”

I know we are all apt to think that we live in the most important era of history and I admit that under certain aspects every day is a crisis, but I claim liberty to say that there never was a period in the world’s history when Christian activity, and prayerfulness, and genuine revival were more needed than just now. Where is our nation? Is it not on the very verge of becoming, once again, a province of the Pope’s dominion? Are not the modern Pharisees compassing sea and land to make proselytes? Does it not seem as if the people were gone mad upon their idols and were altogether fascinated by the charms of the Whore of Babylon, and drunken with her cup? Do you not see everywhere the old orthodox faith forsaken, and men occupying Christian pulpits who do not believe, but even denounce the doctrines which they have sworn to defend?

Might I not say of Christendom in England, that “her whole head is sick and her whole heart faint”? The daughter of Zion staggers in the street for weakness—there is none to help her among all her sons—all her friends have dealt treacherously with her, they have become her enemies. Her adversaries are the chief, her enemies prosper. Her Nazarites were purer than snow and their separation from the world was known of all men—but now they are defiled with worldliness until they are blacker than a coal! From the daughter of Zion her beauty is departed. O you that love her, let your hearts sound as a harp for her! O you that love her, weep day and night for her hypocrisy, for unless the Lord returns unto her the time of her sore distress draws near. Thus says the Lord, “Arise, cry out in the night season, pour out your hearts like water before the Lord, and then the Lord will return and be gracious to His inheritance.”

When God visits a people they will not only attend to prayer and preaching, and stir each other up to do so at once, but THEY WILL HAVE A SPECIAL EYE TO GOD IN THESE DUTIES. Observe, they shall say, “Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of Hosts.”  Beloved, how different is my text from that formal worship into which it is so easy to fall. “I have been to the Prayer Meeting. I have done my duty and I can go home satisfied. I have taken a seat at the Tabernacle and listened to two sermons on Sunday—I feel I have done my duty.”

Oh, dear Hearer! That is a poor way of living! I need a great deal more than all that or I shall be wretched. At the Prayer Meeting I must see God, I must pour out my soul before Him! I must feel that the spirit of prayer has been there and that I have participated in it, otherwise what was the good of my being there? I must, when in the assembly on Sunday, find some blessing to my own soul! I must get another glimpse of the Savior! I must come to be somewhat more like Him! I must feel my sin rebuked, or my flagging Graces revived! I must feel that God has been blessing poor sinners and bringing them to Christ! I must feel, indeed, that I have come into contact with God, or else what is my Sunday  worth, and what is my having been in the assembly worth? If God shall bless you, indeed, you will worship spiritually and you will count nothing to be true worship which is not of the spirit and of the heart and soul.

It is a blessed sign of God’s visiting a people when  EACH ONE OF THEM IS RESOLVED, PERSONALLY, THAT HE WILL, IN A SPIRITUAL MANNER, WAIT UPON GOD. Notice the last four words. “I will go also.” “Let us go speedily to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of Hosts: I will go also.” That is the point—“I will go also.” The Christian man should neither be content, when he goes to worship, to leave others behind, nor should he be content to drive others before him and stop behind himself. It is said of Julius Caesar that he owed his victories to the fact that he never said to his soldiers, “Go,” but always said, “Let us go.” That is the way to win. Example is mightier than precept!

We read of the Pharisees of old that they laid burdens on other men’s shoulders, but they themselves did not touch them with one of their fingers—true Christians are not so. They say, “I will go also.” Was not that bravely spoken of poor old Latimer, when he was to be burnt with Ridley. Ridley was a younger and stronger man, and as he walked to the stake, old Latimer, with his quaintness about him to the last, cried to his Brother, Ridley, “Have after, as fast as my poor old legs can carry me.” The dear old saint was marching to his burning as fast as he could—not at all loath to lay his aged body upon the altar for his Lord! That is the kind of man who makes others into men—the man who habitually says, “I will go also; even if I am called to be burned for Christ. Whatever is to be done or suffered, I will go also.”

I would be ashamed to stand here and say to you, “Brothers and Sisters, pray. Brothers, preach. Brethren, labor,” and then be an idler myself. And you, also, would be ashamed to say to others, “Let us pray. Let us be earnest,” while you are not praying and not earnest yourselves. Example is the backbone of instruction! Be, yourself, what you would have others be and do, yourself, what you would have others do. “I will go also,” because I need to pray as much as anybody else. I will go to hear the Word, for I need to hear it as well as others. I will go and wait upon God, for I need to see His face. I will cry to Him for a blessing, for I need a blessing. I will confess my sin before Him, for I am full of sin. I will ask mercy through the precious blood of Jesus, for I must have it or perish.

“I will go also.” If nobody else will go, I will go. And if all the rest go I will go also. I do not want to pledge any of you this morning. I shall not, therefore, ask you to hold up your hands, but I should like to put it very personally to all the members of this Church. We have enjoyed the Presence and blessing of God for many years in a very remarkable manner and it is not taken from us. But I am jealous, I believe it is a godly jealousy and not unbelief—lest there should be among us a slackness in prayer and a lack of zeal for the Glory of God. I am fearful of a neglecting of the souls of our neighbors, and a ceasing to believe to the full in our mission and in the call of God to be, each one of us, in this world as Christ was, saviors of others.

My Brothers and Sisters, knit together as we are in Church fellowship and bound by common cords to one blessed Master, let each one say within himself, “I will go also.” The Church shall be the subject of my prayer. The minister shall share in my petitions. The Sunday school shall not be forgotten. The College shall be remembered in supplication. The Orphanage shall have my heart’s petitions. I will plead with God for the Evangelists. I will consider the congregation at the Tabernacle and pray that it may gently melt into the Church. I will pray for the strangers who fill the aisles and crowd the pews that God will bless them. Yes, I will say unto God this day, “My God, You have saved me, given me a part and lot among Your people and put me in Your garden where Your people grow and flourish. I will not be a barren tree, but abound in fruit, especially in prayer. If I cannot do anything else I can pray. If this is my one mite, I will put that into the treasury. I will put You in remembrance and plead with You, and give You no rest until You establish Your cause and make it praise in the earth.”

I am not asking more of you than Jesus would ask, nor do I exact anything at your hands—you will cheerfully render that which is a tribute due to the infinite love of your Lord. Now, do not say, dear Brother, “I hope the Church will wake up.” Leave it alone and mind that you wake up yourself. Do not say, “I hope they will be stirred up this morning.” Never mind others! Stir up yourself. Begin to enquire, “Which Prayer Meeting shall I go to, for I mean to join the people of God and let them hear my voice, or at least have my presence. And if I cannot go to the Tabernacle I will drop in near my own house. And if there is no meeting there I will open my own house—the largest room of any cottage shall be used for a Prayer Meeting—or my parlor if I have one. I will have a share in the glorious work of attracting a blessing from the skies. I will send up my electric rod of prayer into the clouds of blessing to bring down the Divine force.”

Do it! Do it! Let each one say, “I will go also.” May God bless this Word to His people, and I am sure it will result in benediction to sinners.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

PCA 38th General Assembly Overture 2

The deaconess issue will occupy a prominent place in General Assembly deliberations once more this summer thanks to a pre-emptive strike by Central Carolina Presbytery (CCP). The overture (number 2) heads off a very different overture that is expected to come before the Assembly from Metro-Atlanta Presbytery (MAP). [Editorial Note: a similarly worded yet very distinct overture was just approved by Evangel Presbytery on February 9, Overture 7. Also Overture 9 from Eastern Carolina Presbytery has been submitted and is exactly like CCP's Overture 2.]  The two could not be more diametrically opposite. The proposed MAP overture reads:
WHEREAS, the biblical office of elder was instituted by a divine commandment, “Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘Gather for me seventy men whom you know to be elders of the people and officers over them and bring them to the tent of meeting, and let them take their stand with you. And I will come down and talk with you there. And I will take some of the Spirit that is on you and put it on them, and they shall bear the burden of the people with you so that you may not bear it yourself alone.’” (Numbers 11:16-17) See also 1Timothy 5:17 and Hebrews 13:7-17; and,

WHEREAS, this plurality of elders was continued in the development of synagogues into the Second Temple Era and into the New Testament; and,

WHEREAS, Scriptures specify that Elders are set apart and necessary for every local church and the broader Church,
1.Acts 14:23: “And when they [Paul and Barnabas] had appointed elders for them in every church, with prayer and fasting they committed them to the Lord in whom they had believed.”

2.Titus 1:5: “This is why I left you in Crete, so that you might put what remained into order, and appoint elders in every town as I directed you…” (See also Acts 11:30; 13:1; 15:2, 4, 22; 20:17; 1Timothy 4:14; James 5:14; 1Peter 5:1-2; and Philippians 1:1); and,
WHEREAS, the Presbyterian Church in America Book of Church Order, in obedience to Scripture, therefore, requires a plurality of elders for the particularization of a local church (BCO 5-9) and for the ongoing functioning of a local church (BCO 12-1); and,

WHEREAS, the office of elder is that of spiritual and ecclesiastical governance, “Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching” (1Timothy 5:17). (See also Acts 20:28; [BCO 12-5]); and,

WHEREAS, the New Testament office of deacon was established, not by the direct revelation of a divine command, but by apostolic prudence, and not in a governing office but as an office of service, Acts 6:2 – 4 “‘It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables. Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty.’”; and,

WHEREAS, Scripture establishes standards for deacons, 1Timothy 3:8: “Deacons likewise, must be dignified, not double-tongued, not addicted to much wine, not greedy for dishonest gain.”; and,

WHEREAS, Scripture reveals that only the churches of Philippi (Philippians 1:1), Ephesus (1Timothy 3:8-13) and Jerusalem (Acts 6:1-6) are specified as having deacons, though Phoebe in the church at Cenchreae was called a deacon by Paul in Romans 16:1: “I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant [Greek: diakonos] of the church at Cenchreae…”; and,

WHEREAS, the diaconal ministry is that of sympathy and service, not of spiritual and ecclesiastical governance, and any authority that may be attached to the office of deacon is a derivative authority, with plurality of elders serving as the final authority in a local church (BCO 9-1; 9-2; 9-6); and,

WHEREAS, though the office of deacon is “ordinary and perpetual,” (BCO 9-1) it is not one that is an absolute necessity for the particularization (BCO 5-10) or ongoing ministry (BCO 9-2) of a local church; and,

WHEREAS, in the PCA, individuals at all levels of the church, including missionaries, vacation Bible school workers, Sunday school teachers, Women in the Church officers, and countless other church workers (both men and women) have been commissioned throughout the entire history of the PCA and the Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod; and,​

WHEREAS, upon completion of Joining and Receiving (J & R), the RPCES practice of commissioning deaconesses was carried over to the PCA, (Minutes of the Ninth General Assembly, PCA, 1981, p. 305); and,

WHEREAS, the RPCES had conducted a detailed study of the issue of deaconesses during the period 1974-8 and adopted the following resolution:
“Resolved: that in light of the action of the 155th General Synod, we do not recommend allowing each particular church within the domination to determine whether its diaconate shall include men as well as women, nor that they be allowed to ordain a woman as a deacon. We also remind churches that they are free to elect Spirit filled women as deaconesses and to set them apart by prayer (156th General Synod Minutes of the RPCES, 1978, pp. 133-134). (A copy of the full study report is attached); and,
WHEREAS, in connection with J & R, the PCA acknowledged the practices of denominations so received by stating, “In receiving these denominations, the Presbyterian Church in America recognizes the history of the respective denominations as part of her total history and receives their historical documents as valuable and significant material which will be used in the perfecting of the Church (Minutes of the Ninth General Assembly, PCA, 1981, p. 305); and,

WHEREAS, the PCA Book of Church Order, (since its First Edition, published in 1975, and continuing to the present in the Sixth Edition) authorizes its church Sessions to appoint “godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need.” (Emphasis added)

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Metro Atlanta Presbytery hereby overtures the 38th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America to amend Book of Church Order 9-7 to include the following sentence to be placed at the end of the section
“These assistants to the deacons, selected by means determined by each Session, may be commissioned, but not ordained.
The entire section 9-7, therefore, would read:
“9-7.​It is often expedient that the Session of a church should select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need. These assistants to the deacons, selected by means determined by each Session, may be commissioned, but not ordained.”
Without all the "whereas" statements, this overture might not initially appear to be about deaconesses. It is in fact the practice of many PCA churches to have commissioning services for missionaries, teachers, etc. The problem with the overture lies not so much in what it is asking the Assembly to do (i.e. permit the commissioning of diaconal assistants), but in fact lies with the "whereas" statements, statements which are rife with poor exegesis and theology and clearly have the eventual ordination of women to the diaconate in mind. Let's look at some of the worst.
WHEREAS, the New Testament office of deacon was established, not by the direct revelation of a divine command, but by apostolic prudence, and not in a governing office but as an office of service, Acts 6:2.
This statement has a couple of problems. First it is simply a poor statement of apostolic authority. While it is true that no direct divine command was ever given regarding the establishment of the diaconate, if we reject apostolic authority in the church as part of the culmination of God's revelation in Christ, then we really have to tear all of the epistles out of our Bibles, don't we? But since the church is built on the apostles and prophets (Ephesians 2:20), then we have believe that the divinely inspired record of their first command to the church was correct and authoritative.

Second, saying that the Seven of Acts 6 only engaged in a ministry of service ignores the rest of the biblical record. Acts 6:8 tells us that Stephen was working "great wonders and signs." In Acts 8, Philip, one of the Seven, taught, preached, worked miracles, and even baptized! (C.f. Acts 21:8) One can only say that the biblical model for deacons is merely one of service if one is selective in his exegesis.
WHEREAS, Scripture establishes standards for deacons, 1Timothy 3:8: “Deacons likewise, must be dignified, not double-tongued, not addicted to much wine, not greedy for dishonest gain.”
Again, if apostolic command is not divine command...well, we have more problems than one of polity.
Phoebe in the church at Cenchreae was called a deacon by Paul in Romans 16:1: “I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant [Greek: diakonos] of the church at Cenchreae…”;
Ah, Phoebe, who is supposed to prove that the early Christian church had deaconesses. In reality, Phoebe does not help the position. Let's talk about her.

First she is  in fact called a diakonon, the Greek word from which we get our word "deacon." The noun is feminine, so it is lexically possible to translate the word "deaconess," but is that a valid translation? Not clearly.

First, the Greek word does not necessarily mean "deacon" in the sense that we do. It appears 28 times in the New Testament (outside of this passage). Eight times the word refers to household servants. Twice it refers to pagan government officials. Twice it refers to Christ himself. Seven times it refers to pastors. Three times it refers to false apostles. Paul uses it of himself four itmes. Only twice does it refer to an office of the Church. Think about that, Gentle Reader. Only 7% of the times that diakonos appears in the Scripture, does it actually refer to the office of deacon. Since the only infallible interpreter of Scripture is Scripture and since we interpret obscure passages by clear ones, why do egalitarians hang so much on Phoebe? Because she serves their purposes. Coveniently ignored are the usages that refer to unbelievers, apostles, pastors, and Christ himself.

Second, the fact that the feminine form is used (diaknonon) really proves nothing. English does not apply gender to words for the most part, but Greek did. Phoebe was a woman, so we can only say for certain that it was grammatically proper to refer to her in the feminine. More than that is sheer speculation.

But, it is objected, Phoebe is called a "diakonon of the church in Cenchrea." That MUST mean she served the church in an official capacity. But all the phrase proves was that she was associated with and served that church, not that she was an officer of it.

Next, consider the qualifications of the office of deacon in 1 Timothy3:8-12. While not obvious in English, the Greek employs masculine nouns/verbs nine times in these verses. (The identification of the "women" in verse 11 does not clearly point to deaconesses. Rather, since verse 12 says that deacons should be "one woman men," employing the same word for "women" as in verse 11, it seems much more likely that verse 11 refers to the wives of deacons and not deaconesses.)

Given the flexibility of the term diakonos in the Bible and the clearer statements of 1 Timothy, it seems reasonable to conclude that Phoebe was not a deacon in the sense that we use the word. In short, Phoebe provides very weak evidence, if any at all, that the early church had deaconesses.
WHEREAS, upon completion of Joining and Receiving (J & R), the RPCES practice of commissioning deaconesses was carried over to the PCA, (Minutes of the Ninth General Assembly, PCA, 1981, p. 305); and,

WHEREAS, the RPCES had conducted a detailed study of the issue of deaconesses during the period 1974-8 and adopted the following resolution:

“Resolved: that in light of the action of the 155th General Synod, we do not recommend allowing each particular church within the domination to determine whether its diaconate shall include men as well as women, nor that they be allowed to ordain a woman as a deacon. We also remind churches that they are free to elect Spirit filled women as deaconesses and to set them apart by prayer (156th General Synod Minutes of the RPCES, 1978, pp. 133-134). (A copy of the full study report is attached); and,

WHEREAS, in connection with J & R, the PCA acknowledged the practices of denominations so received by stating, “In receiving these denominations, the Presbyterian Church in America recognizes the history of the respective denominations as part of her total history and receives their historical documents as valuable and significant material which will be used in the perfecting of the Church (Minutes of the Ninth General Assembly, PCA, 1981, p. 305);
This is a pure ad populum argument that proves nothing. While the PCA did allow the RPCES to keep their deaconesses, the RPCES agreed to submit to our polity, which specifically forbids deaconesses from being ordained.

Finally,
WHEREAS, the PCA Book of Church Order, (since its First Edition, published in 1975, and continuing to the present in the Sixth Edition) authorizes its church Sessions to appoint “godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need.” (Emphasis added)

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Metro Atlanta Presbytery hereby overtures the 38th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America to amend Book of Church Order 9-7 to include the following sentence to be placed at the end of the section

“These assistants to the deacons, selected by means determined by each Session, may be commissioned, but not ordained."
Now we come to the rub. By the overture's own admission, it is the practice of churches to commission people for various endeavors without ordaining them. The "whereas" statements make it clear, however, that the over-arching motivation here is to publicly set women apart as deaconesses. (One is forced to wonder what male assistants to the deacons would be called.)

And this is really the challenge. Post-moderns would have us believe that words essentially are meaningless, but that is manifestly not so. Words communicate ideas and ideas have consequences.

Take for instance an unfortunate choice of words I made in a theology class once. I referred to the Person and work of God. My theology professor jumped all over the phrase, reminding me that God is three Persons, not one. Now I am no modalist, so I hastily changed my language because words...ideas...have consequences. They really do here. To call female assistants to the diaconate "deaconesses" (leaving the poor male assistants in the cold), is to obfuscate the meaning of the word "deacon" and can only lead to further confusion, disorder, and theological decline in our denomination.

Now, consider the text of Overture 2 from Carolina Presbytery, which has at its heart, the concept that words do actually have meaning:
Whereas, the PCA is grateful to God for the outstanding and selfless work done by the women of PCA congregations and freely acknowledges that the ability of the church to minister to a lost and dying world depends in large part on the self-sacrificing volunteer spirit of our female members; and

Whereas, the PCA also believes that, the officers of the Church, by whom all its powers are administered, are, according to the Scriptures, teaching and ruling elders and deacons (BCO 1-5) and that in accord with Scripture, these offices are open to men only (BCO 7-2); and

Whereas, the PCA believes that scripture teaches that the officers of the church are to be ordained not commissioned. (BCO 17, 12-5, 8-6); and

Whereas, while some RPCES congregations had women on their diaconates, the RPCES resolved as part of the J&R agreement with the PCA to "Amend the existing doctrinal standards and Form of Government of the Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod, by substituting for them the doctrinal standards and Book of Church Order of the Presbyterian Church in America" * ; and

Whereas, several churches in the PCA currently elect and commission women to the office of deacon and call them by the title deacon or deaconess and allow them to serve on the diaconate; and

Whereas, BCO 9-7, which states that women may be selected and appointed by the session of a church to serve as assistants to the deacons, is often cited as pretext for this practice of electing and commissioning female deacons;

Therefore, Central Carolina Presbytery hereby overtures the 38th General Assembly to amend BCO Chapter 9-7 by adding the words:
These assistants to the deacons shall not be referred to as deacons or deaconesses, nor are they to be elected by the congregation nor formally commissioned, ordained, or installed as though they were office bearers in the church.
So that the revised version would read:

9-7. It is often expedient that the Session of a church should select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need.  These assistants to the deacons shall not be referred to as deacons or deaconesses, nor are they to be elected by the congregation nor formally commissioned, ordained, or installed as though they were office bearers in the church. 
Central Carolina's Overture nails the issue and what is at stake here. If you want to commission the assistants to the diaconate, male and female, do so. But let's be clear in our terms, shall we?

Feed My Sheep: A Passionate Plea for Preaching (Review)

Feed My Sheep: A Passionate Plea for Preaching is a must read for every Pastor and those aspiring to the office.  

There is not that much to say about this book because of its makeup, except to say that it is split up into eleven different chapters with a different author for each chapter. To understand what a goldmine there is here, just check out the Table of Contents:






1. The Primacy of Preaching (R. Albert Mohler Jr.)
2. The Foolishness of Preaching (James Montgomery Boice)
3. Expository Preaching (Derek W. H. Thomas)
4. Experiential Preaching (Joel R. Beeke)
5. The Teaching Preacher (R.C. Sproul)
6. Preaching to the Mind (R.C. Sproul Jr.)
7. Preaching to the Heart (Sinclair Ferguson)
8. Preaching with Authority (Don Kistler)
9. Evangelistic Preaching (Eric Alexander)
10. Preaching to Suffering People (John Piper)
11. A Reminder to Shepherds (John MacArthur)
Enjoy!

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Are Teaching Elders More Important Than Ruling Elders?

Well, Ruling Elders is that what you think?  Or Teaching Elders is that what you believe?  It is time for the Ruling Elder to take his place as a shepherd of Christ's Church not only in position/office but in reality.  Here is a great post dealing with the on-going problem of the Federal Vision in the PCA and the role of the Ruling Elder in Presbyterianism.   

Does It Happen That You Forget Jesus?

How often is it that we forget Jesus?  Every day some person takes your heart.  Your husband, your wife, you child, a loved one, a friend...  Every day some material possession steals your focus away.  Your money, your house, your car, your toys, your pet...  Every day some earthly pleasure comes to be the center of your universe.  You become fixated on this world, when it is this world that leads you down to the very pits of hell.  It is the world which puts before you such things which seem so succulent, chocolate, candy and other goodies, when in reality those things contain the hidden razor blades. 

But don't you know that you have not received a spirit from this world, but the Spirit who is from God?  Don't remain enslaved to this world any longer.  You are not slaves of this world and sin, but of the Lord Jesus Christ and His righteousness.  How can you forget the One who humiliated Himself so you could be exalted?  How can you forget the One who sacrificed Himself so you could live?  How can you forget the One who became sin on your behalf so you would be the righteousness of God in Him?  How can you forget the One who loved you with an unending love?   O this beloved is Jesus, your Master, Your Savior, Your King, Your Redeemer, Your Life.  Forget Him not!

Friday, February 5, 2010

Please Consider Modesty


A friend recently referred me to a great article on Modesty by Terry Johnson.  It is a must read for everyone.  Especially considering what I have experienced in the past, just in two churches (certainly, in almost every church I have gone to there has been some kind of issue with modesty).  The first was last week in worship in Jackson, Mississippi.  A girl with a see-through shirt. Good thing she was sitting in front of me.  Then I remember the teenager showing off her cleavage because of a low-cut shirt she wore during worship at a church in Northeast Misssissippi.  When I got up to exhort the congregation, she sat on the back left side of the meeting room.  Consequently, I preached primarily to those on the right side of the meeting room!  Now I understand, having lived with my wife, that all women aren't necessarily trying to get men to look at them when they wear such clothes.  But they have been influenced by the culture and as Christians are ignorant as it has to do with what men really see.  
So please let us think about our clothing.  One quote from the article is helpful for both males and females, "Given the strength of Jesus' warning about lust (it violates the 7th Commandment prohibiting adultery), the extreme measures that He urges to avoid it (plucking out our eyes, cutting off our hands), the direct Apostolic command to women to "adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly" (1 Timothy 2:7), and given that one comes to worship in order to promote sanctification and piety, it is remarkable that girls and women show up at churches dressed as they do (Matthew 5:30)."  Please consider modesty.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Jonathan Edwards' Resolutions (Part 1)

Many of you are familiar with the resolutions Jonathan Edwards made.  In the preface to his resolutions he said, "Being sensible that I am unable to do anything without God's help, I do humbly entreat him by his grace to enable me to keep these Resolutions, so far as they are agreeable to his will, for Christ's sake." 

Let us look at four of them individually:
"Resolved, never to lose one moment of time; but to improve it the most profitable way I possibly can.

Resolved, to maintain the strictest temperance in eating and drinking.

Resolved, never henceforward, until I die, to act as if I were any way my own; but entirely and altogether God's.

Resolved, to endeavor to my utmost to act as I think I would do, if I had already seen the happiness of heaven, and the torments of hell."
The first resolution above concerns loving our Lord by keeping the eighth commandment.  That we wouldn't steal the time God has given to us or waste it.  Our Lord has given us His Word which says in Proverbs 18, "He also that is slothful in his work is brother to him that is a great waster." and in 2 Thessalonians 3, "For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies."  Let us not live as slothful or lazy, we do this all the time in our work, within our families.  But we can't lose one moment of time.  Our Lord and Savior has given each second to us, do not waste your life with frivolous pursuits.  What will it gain you?  More importantly, what will it gain for the Kingdom and His glory?  Nothing!  But to you have been revealed and taught the mysteries which in ages past were hidden from wise men, even the prophets.  You know who your Messiah is, you know who delivered you from all your sins. It was Jesus who is your propitiation (bearing the wrath you very much deserved for your sin).  O let us live for Him, serve Him, give up the pleasures of this life for Him, suffer for Him.  And the promise, if we endure, we will reign with Him, we will receive a righteous man's reward, we will receive eternal blessings in Christ Jesus that cannot be conceived of in our little minds.  Let us improve the time we are given in the most profitable way possible for His glory.  You will not be disappointed, but you will store up treasures in heaven.

Followers

  © Blogger template 'Personal Blog' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP